https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17409179/

The thought that young children are using these suggest they'll suffer issues in their mid twenties which is horrifying, and then the issues could get worse throughout their life.

all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

There's no ionizing radiation given off by cell phones. Guess what, the older you get the chances of brain tumors goes up.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That’s not how odds ratios (or research) work. The compares groups of cell phone users and non-cell phone users.

    With that being said, we’ve always known cell phone use has a correlation with very slightly increased cancer rates. That shouldn’t be controversial. It’s not concluding that there’s a direct cause or even, if they did cause it, that it’s from RF.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Glad you used the word correlation here, because surely high cell phone use can also have a correlation with low physical activity and probably poor diet and other things that amplify the risk for cancer. Could be anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Guess what, the older you get the chances of brain tumors goes up.

    There are generally accepted ages when brain lessions may start to appear. White matter lesions are not what's being described here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I always knew cancer caused people to use cell phones!

    Edit: on a serious note, the confidence interval for malignant tumors is an odds ratio of 1.2-3.4, although a quick google finds more recent studies (I.e.: not based off of 1990s cell phones) are even lower.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Can confirm. Survived cancer. Haven't survived cell phone addiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Good on you for surviving cancer. Here's hoping that you're not a Nazi! ❤️🤞

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not a nazi! I'm only a monster if you consider a tickle monster to be a monster!

    runs off and ties several people to the train track near a lever

    Oh, don't worry. This train tracks is abandoned. But it makes for a nice steel spot to tie captives to so they can't squirm away while I tickle their feet! Now where did I put that feather......

    train zooms by killing everyone

    .....ah, found it OH MY GOD WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED HERE???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure this study from 2007 has been refuted

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm pretty sure you're just making that up. Lobbyist bot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    You're calling me a bot? In whay sense of the word? Can you find something more recent? Here's what I've found. This metaanalysis from 2020 concluded there was an association. However, this comment points out several flaws in their metaanalysis.

    So I guess we don't 100% know for sure? If that's the case then I'd guess the effect is very small or nonexistant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Two cohort studies and 16 case-control studies on this topic were identified […] The cohort study was of limited value due to methodological shortcomings in the study.

    Thats basically no evidence at all. Case control studies are mostly used to see if there might be some correlation and from that to form a hypothesis for further research.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Who holds a phone next to their head anymore?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Some of us still use phones as phones. Shocking and horrifying, I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, who doesn't call someone every once in a while? Call your mom. Call your dad. Call your wife. Your grandma. Your kids! Friends! (Yeah right. Not since I had kids of my own.) Talk to each other!

    ❤️

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I haven't held a phone to my ear since before smartphones were a thing. Headsets existed for land lines. Speakerphone functions existed on land lines as well as early regular cell phones (as opposed to dumb phones which tend to have more functions than the ultra basic phones did back in the nineties).

    I'm fairly confident that the last time I held a phone to my ear was before the turn of the century. I know it's been that long at least since I would have while driving and/or at work. The cell I had at the time worked better by headset, and there were plenty of cheap and decent ones available

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -4 points 1 year ago*

    It's ok, they're trying to shift the blame from their product / technology to how the user uses the phone incorrectly, you know, like a phone. Just look at the amount of posts in this thread singing the same tune. Coincidence, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Do young children even hold phones near their heads anymore? I rarely see a kid less than their early teens doing anything but FaceTime or games. And after that point, video chats, texting, and doom scrolling.

    Even my 15yo daughter never holds the phone against her head.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago*