source

ht to @hilljam@mastodon.social

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

good reminder that platform holders like spotify and then labels hold almost all that revenue and artists see barely any of it. This has been true forever but the addition of spotifies and apple musics in the mix just removes more money from artists in this equation.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago*

    Just another reason to buy music from the artists own website, if they have one.

    It'll likely be seen as "lost revenue" and therefore piracy by the holders, as I don't imagine that they include small individual sites in their surveys, but the artist will get more money in the end and that's what matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, from what I can find their operating profit was in the negatives every year.

    Not sure how much of their costs go to the label vs. Server and employee costs, though. It's possible they take more of a cut than retail stores do regardless. Bandwidth isn't cheap, and software devs aren't cheap either.

    In any case, the artist sees very little of that money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So over 49 years, it totals less than 1 year of the US military budget.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Why didn’t they make a normal pie chart?! That circle is not very good visualisation.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    surface of the circle is directly proportional to the revenue, this presentation is much better to compare two values to each other (if you have problem comparing how much 367 is compared to 128 and need an image for that, that is). it would be harder in the pie chart.

    if you want share of the total, the bottom graph is much better for that (and it adds layer of information that pie graph wouldn't have).

    i assume that is why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We should invent new futuristic physical media. They should have real heft and ideally make a satisfying noise when you plug them in and be completely overegineered, so they last as long or longer as pottery. Something like upgraded MiniDisc, cassettes or USB sticks. If you plug it in, the device and the connector should be sturdy enough to stand on.

    Maybe looking like this labeler cartridge:

    Or like isolinear chips from Star Trek:

    I know Microsoft is doing something similar with Project Silica.

    Please anyone, if you can give examples from fiction or reality, I'm happy to hear it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    I love this data visualization. Very groovy!

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I couldn't find explaination about "digital license" and "mp3", if I buy music on Bancamp or Steam, where is it counted ?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Low-key wish cassettes would make a comeback

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    They sort of are. A lot of hardcore shows I go to always offer cassettes at the merch table.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah cassettes never went away when it comes to punk. It's a cheap way to distribute your music in physical form as well, which is a big part of why it's so present in punk and indie music.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I bought a cassette this weekend at a smaller local concert. They only had cassette and CDs. CD just feels meh to me and I also don't have a CD drive around anymore, so I went with the tape. The format is really cool for smaller bands as you don't need much effort to release them. Just design the small piece of paper and you're good to go. It's also better to carry around during the concert compared to being stuck with the huge-ass vinyl in the pit lol.

    If possible, I prefer to get a vinyl, but I get it that it's a pain in the ass for smaller semi-professional bands as it's expensive a fuck to release on vinyl. So cassette it is, now I only need to get my hands on a tape deck lmao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Am I the only one who is totally confused by the lower plot? How is the data distributed among the positive and negative y axis? Is the negative portion supposed to be negative annual revenue? Why are CDs then in the positive and negative at the same time. I desperately need more labeling or explanation please. It sure looks nice, but I'm completely at loss...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    How is the data distributed among the positive and negative y axis?

    It's symmetrical. There is actually nothing negative shown in that graph. The graph could be flat at the bottom on the axis that it would change nothing. However, it looks like soundwaves.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The width is proportional to the revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So the axis with the year isn't actually 0 pr something else? Its just how much revenue was made in total (2000s were the time with most revenue) and how much each media contributed in a funky way of displaying it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    It would have been less confusing to have vertical lines rather than an x axis however they wanted it to look like a soundwave. However even though I am an electronic musician who works with soundwaves I didn't notice the metaphor until reading the comment here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Thanks for pointing that out. It is a bit like the distribution on a violin plot then. But it still is weird how the colors are distributed and albeit I think it does indeed look nice, I think this plot shouldn't be in this community...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    There's no positive or negative, just share (width). It is done creatively but still accurately, it looks like the most dominant segment takes the center allowing you to easily spot which was the most popular at what year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    That increase of ad supported steaming makes me not hopeful for the future.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Feels weird that it includes ad supported streaming and not radio

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Now seems like the perfect time to either pirate because you know your favorite artists ain't getting hardly anything of the billions from streaming services. That, or go direct through the artists own service they set up themselves. Either way, it always is a good day when you can just say "No!" to the large music companies or companies invested in music salesin some way or another.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I just bought a record from an artist Merch booth at a concert last weekend. Feels good and I got it signed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    There was an event going on in the large downtown park in my hometown and there was a local band who I would have totally bought one of their CDs, but my card wasn't working. I would have totally spent $10 to support them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I heard the other day that cassettes are selling again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    This only seems to cover the US?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›