top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Why is everything RISC-V some low power device, I want a workstation with PCIe 5.0 powered by RISC-V.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Cause it's immature and low power devices are easier

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What needs to be improved? The standards or manufacturing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I'd guess they'd need to figure out whatever apple did with it's arm chips.
    efficient use of many-cores and probably some fancy caching arrangement.

    It'll may also be a matter of financing to be able to afford (compete with intel, apple, amd, nvidia) to book the most advanced manufacturing for decent sized batches of more complex chips.

    Once they have proven reliable core/chip designs , supporting more products and a growing market share, I imagine more financing doors will open.

    I'd guess risc-v is mostly financed by industry consortia maybe involving some governments so it might not be about investor finance, but these funders will want to see progress towards their goals. If most of them want replacements for embedded low power arm chips, that's what they're going to prioritise over consumer / powerful standalone workstations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    At a minimum they've got to design a wider issue. Current high-performance superscalar chips like the XuanTie 910 (what this laptop's SoC are built around) are only triple-issue (3-wide superscalar), which gives a theoretical maximum of 3 ipc per core. (And even by RISC standards, RISC-V has pretty "small" instructions, so 3 ipc isn't much compared to 3 ipc even on ARM. E.g., RISC-V does not have any comparison instructions, so comparisons need to be composed of at least a few more elementary instructions). As you widen the issue, that complicates the pipelining (and detecting pipeline hazards).

    There's also some speculation that people are going to have to move to macro-op fusion, instead of implementing the ISA directly. I don't think anyone's actually done that in production yet (the macro-op fusion paper everyone links to was just one research project at a university and I haven't seen it done for real yet). If that happens, that's going to complicate the core design quite a lot.

    None of these things are insurmountable. They just take people and time.

    I suspect manufacturing is probably a big obstacle, too, but I know quite a bit less about that side of things. I mean a lot of companies are already fabbing RISC-V using modern transistor technologies.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I think that's the whole point of all risc - it saves power over cisc but may take longer to compute some tasks.

    That'd be why things like phones with limited batteries often prefer risc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    milk-v is going to release a pretty powerful system, iirc i read it will be released in about 10 months, ventana also reportedly will release a server cpu in 2024.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Does the trackpoint work like an old IBM thinkpad? If so this would be a really neat computer.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's called a nipple. And yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Do you have one? The Thinkpad trackpoint was great but no other company that put a "nub/nipple" on their laptops was as good. I think IBM put a lot of effort into that device and whatever knockoffs Dell, HP etc were using were clumsy and uncomfortable in comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Are netbooks making a comeback?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Does RISC-V have security benefits since it is open source? Is it easier to detect hardware backdoors if it is used instead of x86 or ARM?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    RISC-V instruction set (ISA) is open source. But the actual implementation (microarchitecture) has no such obligations. And among the implementations that can run Linux, none (that I know) are open source designs.

    With regards to hardware backdoors - no, closed source RISC-V implementations are not easier than x86 or ARM to audit for security.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The Pad 4A is a bit more interesting to me. 1280x800 is really awful in 2023. But the pad 4A has a 10" 1920x1200 display which would be so much nicer in a small form factor laptop.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    While I agree with you with the 16:10 display being nicer, in terms of size. 1280x800 isn't bad once you take into consideration of screen size. Like the ppi for both displays are in the low 200s. A 1080p 15.6 in display has a lower ppi than both of those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To me it’s less about the PPI and more the ability to fit things on the screen.

    1280x800 is just small enough that that certain elements might not fit on the screen. Or if they do they just barely fit with no wiggle room. 1920x1200 is probably unreadable to even freaks like me (I run 150% scaling on a 16” 4K display) but it gives me the option to turn off/down scaling and actually fit things when needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Hmmm I wonder if it's possible to hack together that tiny keyboard together with a Steam Deck...

  • source
  • [–] [B] 5 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Known as the Lichee Console 4A, the laptop features a display size of just 7 inches, 16GB of memory, and an LM4A TH1520 processor.

    Despite its small size, the Lichee Console 4A packs the features and functionality that you'd generally expect from a mainstream x86 laptop in this price range: LPDDR4X memory, 128GB of eMMC storage, and an optional external NGFF SSD.

    Display-wise, the video resolution of the 7-inch display is 1280 x 800 featuring capacitive touch touchscreen support, plus a mini HDMI port for external monitor output.

    There's also a 2MP front camera that should suffice for basic web calling.

    Additionally, there's also a microSD slot reader, which can expand the device's storage on top of what it already has.

    Other miscellaneous specs include a battery capacity of 3000mAh, RedPoint (seemingly a copy of Lenovo's TrackPoint), a 72-key keyboard, an aluminum outer shell, and a weight of 650 grams.


    The original article contains 295 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 49%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    How well can it play Minecraft theoretically?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Any estimation on the battery life?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›