all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 40 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Germany is Europes biggest country by population and GDP (not counting Russia and Turkey for population). It makes perfect sense for them to be the biggest spenders on defence as well.

Ironically the ultra right wing AfD party is actually against the rearmament, but that is mostly because they are Putin's puppets. (They claim fiscal responsibility concerns but this is a laughably transparent excuse)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    They're against it in the same way any right wing populous group is. They pretend to be against big government and want to "end wars". And then do the exact opposite when in power.

    Don't believe fascist when they say they want to reduce spending on war. They just lie until they take enough power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    AfD be like: It's free real estate!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It started like that last time too

  • source
  • Oh good. Germany is rearming.

  • source
  • Get rid of those fences!

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    trigger germans to do something and they over-do it. every time.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    German media can't wait to show german tanks stuck at the ostfront again these days.

  • source
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's Russia that shouldn't be a country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A collection of the smaller ethnic states which The Russian Empire conquered and genocided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Even if they did separate, there would still be a Russia, and it would not lose as much as one might think.

    And even so, it is a bad idea. There are so many disputes between the nations, that we would likely see a few wars. Something like what is happening between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Also, many of them are too small to exist in a meaningful was as independent countries, and I honestly don't see the harm in them remaining in Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There are so many disputes between the nations, that we would likely see a few wars.

    Since the break up of the USSR, Russia has fought two wars in Chechnya and invaded both Georgia and Ukraine. I’m failing to see how the prospect of perennial future wars is something to worry about when they’re already engaging in what you’re worried about.

    Also, Russia is partially to blame for the Armenian-Azeri war as they have failed to uphold their CTSO obligations to Armenia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, but it is going to be even worse. Russian Caucasus is going to have a few wars at least, hell, it did happen to an extent when the federal government was weak. There are territorial disputes and conflicts that are only suspended for as long as these republics are a part of Russia.

    So my point stands: there are reasons to be opposed to the "balkanisation of Russia" and no reasons to support it, unless you want that because you just want to hurt Russia, but in this case be honest with yourself and do not pretend you are doing it for the ethnic minorities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Correcting historic injustice is usually pretty messy. I’m not looking for Russia to be hurt, I’m looking for it to be broken up so it can no longer wage the wars of conquest it has consistently engaged in as well as giving the ethnic minorities that imperial Russia and the USSR oppressed the self determination they deserve. There would have been no wars in the caucuses in the 90’s if not for Russian imperialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You mentioned the invasion of Georgia, and it seems from the context like you believe it to be an injust invasion. Is this correct? Do you believe Georgia is entitled to the land it lost?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Which time? When the Bolsheviks ousted a democratic government in 1921? When the Red Army crushed protests in 1989?

    I get your implied point that Ossetians and Abkhazians did not feel included in the Georgian nationalist government that took over after independence, but I also think that Russia crafted the conditions that created this problem in the first place and intervention from them was not the solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But is this not irrelevant? It seems to me that you believe that North Ossetia should be independent, despite the fact that Ossetians do not want independence from Russia, and South Ossetia should not be independent, despite the fact that South Ossetians would rather not be a part of Georgia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I believe in self determination, so I don’t have a problem with any group deciding they want to be Russian in a free and fair election. That said, I find that Russia’s involvement in the Caucuses has been wholly self serving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, I believe that without Russia, Russian Caucasus will be a worse place overall, and will also have a few wars.

    South Ossetia and Abkhazia are also worse off than they would be had they remained in Georgia.

    It seems to me that this sort of nationalism is counterproductive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There are already wars in the Russian caucuses.

    I cannot prove or disprove a negative, so I’m not going to touch your second point.

    Georgian nationalism was so fervent at the fall of the USSR because of Russian oppression. They haven’t done anything to clean up the mess they created because frozen conflict on their borders is beneficial to Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There are no wars now.

    The wars happened when the central government was too weak to deal with them, which supports my point somewhat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The logical conclusion to your point is that Russia should be allowed to conquer the world to end all wars. The problem with that is that no one wants to live under Russian rule, and Russia fights wars to take control over those countries and then genocides them afterwards. This is not better.

    My hope is for Russia to get small and weak enough that they can no longer wage wars on their neighbors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    This is simply not correct. Quite a lot of people would prefer not to separate from Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Then they wouldn't fight a war for independence would they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Precisely.

    And this is why a lot of peoples did not, in fact, fight a war of independence against Russia.

    And the Chechens, for instance, wanted independence because they were subjected to a genocide by the USSR when it was ruled by a Georgian, so this is hardly a usual case for the ethnic minorities, since most of them were not genocided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The main reason the rest don't fight is because they were already too badly genocided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Exactly. In fact, my nation was genocided so hard by the Russians, we don't even know it happened.

    The point is, that there is not necessarily a desire to leave. You are generalising unnecessarily.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Ok then America should be a smaller collection of native states that the white settlers genocided.

    I agree in principle. But you can't reverse history to what it SHOULD have been.

    Self determination is I assume your point. Which I'm all for. But that is only as good as how well those states can continue to defend their sovereignty. You break up Russia and then it's just a bunch of small defenseless states that the rest of the world with pick apart for resources as they've done with Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The Balkans are not exactly doing well, are they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Serbia is definitely having issues right now with protests for sure. I’d argue that it’s not exactly surprising that a Russian aligned government has significant issues with corruption. In my view, a Balkanized Russia would be less capable of exporting their toxic politics around the world.

    Other than that, most of the Balkan nations are on the higher end of the human development index, are all tending upwards for GDP (with PPP factored in), and are improving their infrastructure. Definitely a mixed bag when you look at specific areas, but they’re largely doing objectively better than they were 30 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I am not sure if you remember but the process of "balkanisation" was accompanied by certain unfortunate events, that included a genocide, the bombing of Belgrade, among others. Corruption is not the biggest problem here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You said the balkans aren’t doing well; they largely are now. Those wars were a generation ago. Corruption is the biggest problem in the balkans right now as far as I can tell.

    As for Russia, they’re already a genocidal state constantly engaged in war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, yes. Maybe I should have phrased it differently: the "balkanisation of Russia", like actual balkanisation, will be associated with a series of conflicts and deaths, if it does occur.

    Also, genocidal is an overstatement. I do understand that using strong words like "fascism" and "genocide" when they are unwarranted is somewhat in fashion now, but believe it is best not to do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    the "balkanisation of Russia", like actual balkanisation, will be associated with a series of conflicts and death

    Again, this is already status quo from Russia at the moment.

    Also, genocidal is an overstatement.

    A few days after the recapture, on 2 April 2022, news reports and videos emerged showing streets in Bucha covered with the bodies of men dressed in civilian clothes. Some of those found had their hands tied.[14][15] Among those killed were women and children. According to first estimations at least 280 bodies were found.[16] There was also evidence that Russian soldiers had systemically tortured, mutilated and executed many Ukrainians in the basement of a summer camp.[17] The event caused the Ukrainian government to call on the ICC to investigate whether or not Russia had committed war crimes.[18] On 7 April, the mayor of Bucha, Anatoliy Fedoruk, reported that almost 90% of the dead residents had bullet wounds, not shrapnel wounds.

    In August 2023, the Institute for the Study of Warreported that the Ukrainian Resistance Center had claimed to have gained access to documents detailing Russian plans to conduct a decade-long ethnic cleansing campaign in occupied Mariupol. The ISW reported that the depopulation of Ukrainians through deportation and Russian efforts to attract Russian citizens to move to the city is likely to be an ethnic cleansing campaign in addition to being apparent violations of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.[83]

    Russia has forcibly transferred almost 20 thousand Ukrainian children to areas under its control, assigned them Russian citizenship, forcibly adopted them into Russian families, and created obstacles for their reunification with their parents and homeland.[7][8]

    These are genocidal actions, plain and simple. If you have a problem with me characterizing it as such I really don’t have anything else to say to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Do you want another war in Europe? Because that's how you get another war in Europe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Origninal comment is deleted, so i can't see what you're responding to, but I would like to point out that we have had an ongoing war in Europe for the last three years...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Why did we let them be a country again?

    Their comment.

    but I would like to point out that we have had an ongoing war in Europe for the last three years...

    I was picturing something along the lines of WWII's European theater, but fair enough.

  • source
  • parent