just explaining why i'm downvoting

its more like commenting "not funny"

ai slop is garbage, keep it to its designated recepticle and nobody complains

I agree. Both are correct.

Comedy skits don't pretend to be true though. That's a big difference.

Sounds like someone is bad at noticing AI slop...

Slop is slop. Whatever form it takes. Consuming it is for pigs

Ehhh, I'm torn on the vote for this

On One hand, it is unpopular, in that nobody really thinks this. It's also unpopular because I think most people, if not damn near everyone, would think it's stupid and reject it entirely based on the obvious flaws in the comparison even if they didn't disagree.

However, the post looks like rage bait, and you complained about voting, then you veer into mild nastiness. Which makes it likely the post was rage bait.

If you hadn't edited in the crap, I'd have up voted because the original post was a perfect fit for the C/. But, dude, that edit is just lame. So I had to down vote.

You make a post in a community like this, you take the votes as they come. You don't whine about them, and you don't turn it into some kind of ego weirdness.

Your unpopular opinion is that users commenting nothing but "ai slop" on slop ai posts is counterproductive to the discussion, as it provides nothing of value.

I'd argue that posting ai slop in and of itself provides nothing of value. There is nothing of value in generative ai. People are going to comment on it, because it's bad. Get over it, I guess.