List of countries prohibiting the use of a VPN:

  • πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China
  • πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Russia
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ United Arab Emirates
  • πŸ‡°πŸ‡΅ North Korea
  • πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡² Turkmenista

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 147 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Literally impossible to enforce. Any business worth a damn uses vpns. Blocking such would be bad for business. Also, ssl vpns are as far as I'm aware, indistinguishable from regular https traffic.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Its France, your logic has no power here!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm sure they're already planning a traditional riot as I type this comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Mon dieu! Cette comment est trop intolerable! Je proteste!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They'll ban the known IPs of any well known VPN provider. It'll not really affect 90% of VPN users that are tech literate, but the 80% of the People that are Tech illiterate shall be punished and the Politicians shall pretend it works. This is how all the Countries blocking VPNs do it now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Nah it's far more stupid than that. They want to ban some (most?) VPN apps from the iOS and Android stores. You would still be able to sign up for any VPN from your browser, and manually set it up on your phone.

    That's the current proposal anyway, soon they'll understand how moronic it is and either double down and try to "fix" if or quietly drop it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I just think it's corporate interests, not fear, that's driving this. Terror and Children are just the easiest excuse to ensure a lot of people go blindly along with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    What a great club list to be a part of

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Take out Russia and it's the CUNT club

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Rearrange Russia and they can be the CUNTRs.
    I like the sound of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    With France you can go for FUC NTR, which is somewhat worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I fear that the UK might try to join this list not just out of authoritarianism, but out of a fear of technology they do not understand. Worse yet, the Conservative party once threw around the idea of banning encryption in its entirety and acted like WhatsApp is only used by criminals.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ironic, considering how many members of the cabinet are being served court orders for their WhatsApp messages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I've taught my daughter to use a VPN here in the U.S. There's "Kids Online Safety Bill" making it through congress, and if it passes, kids won't be able to access all kinds of websites. Porn, yes, but also just websites about LGBT+ stuff which are perfectly safe for kids. As I have a queer daughter, I want to make absolutely sure she can access those sites if she needs them.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    May I ask how would the "Kids Online safety bill" differentiate between an underage user and adult? I'm not from the US so that's why I don't know

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I don't know. From what I can see, that hasn't been made clear yet. I am guessing, like porn in several states, IDs will be required to access things like TikTok or maybe even YouTube because it requires them to filter content for minors.

    There's a reason anti-LGBTQ bigots love it.

    But even if that doesn't happen, it allows for parental surveillance, and I want her to know that I don't have the option to do that to her even if I wanted to. It should go beyond mere trust.

    If she VPNs to Canada, none of those issues will be things she has to care about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh it's such a fun and novel and not at all dystopian idea they've come up with.

    Content requiring an adult will just require some kind of identification, surely you can't be against providing your ID to any website that hosts adult content or that website checking/accessing/logging with a national archive that you visited said website, right?

    So far, no concrete things put forward, but all of them seem to be related to an ID-required system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    It's not just France, it's EU based politics too. There's certain liberal & center right parties & politicians that heavily push for shit like this, just like the chat control crap.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Russia isn't prohibiting the use of VPNs but it is making it increasingly more headache inducing (protocol based blocking, ip bans of popular vpn providers).

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It's not a total ban of VPNs, I went to read a bit on the subject (easier since I'm french), it's just that some politicians came up with a few amendments relative to the bill called "SREN" which very literally translates to "Securing and regulating the digital space". As you may guess that bill also ticks the "child porn" box as a reason why it came to existence.

    One amendment proposes to ban mobile VPNs that do no comply with European or french regulations in the context of app stores. So it's only on mobile, nothing about desktops.

    Of course it's inapplicable in practice.

    Several amendements already failed due to backlash, one was about preventing people from posting on social networks if they use a VPN.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago

    Yeah was also just listening to a podcast about this. So yeah not a straight total ban. But from what I heard, it would ban people from using VPNs outside of Europe, which obviously is not OK.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    I love our slow descent into authoritarianism with a hint of fascism to go with it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Le smooth brain

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The UK also recently tried banning VPNs. It simply isn't possible. However, it'll make prosecuting dissidents and people with good opsec a lot easier because they can just say "well you might not have anything incriminating on your hard drives but you DO have a VPN client" and use that to get a tiny victory against someone who would otherwise go free.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If all VPNs are banned, french companies are fucked. Any remote login happens via VPN.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I just wonder how the hell they plan on enforcing things like this

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί