In light of Mozilla’s recent policy changes, we no longer feel assured that Firefox aligns with our commitment to protect your privacy. This prompted us to revisit the choice of default web browser in Zorin OS 17.3.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 169 points 1 year ago (23 children)

While FF's evil quotient has been on the rise, Brave definitely isn't a better option. If anything, librewolf is the way to go.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [+] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Agreed, I wouldn't recommend Librewolf for casual users. I understand why Librewolf makes those decisions, and I'm glad that it exists, but you definitely run into some quirks when using it. I'm thinking about switching from Librewolf to Waterfox myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Doesn't Librewolf log you out of every site when you close it, by default? I don't think that's a good default

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It has to be the default tho, bc the whole point of Librewolf is that it's trying to by default be untraceable and private.

    It's very easy to disable that and re-enable cookies and the like, but your default experience will fundamentally be private, which is its goal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 124 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    How is brave the lesser of those two evils?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 114 points 1 year ago

    “Mozilla has a bit been shady lately, so we are making the difficult decision to change our default browser to something significantly more shady. We are confident our users will feel safer knowing their data is in even worse hands than before"

  • source
  • [–] 76 points 1 year ago

    That's a clown makeup moment for Zorin OS

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I'm actually not familiar with this distro. But if I installed a Linux distro, and it had brave installed. I would immediately switch.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They should've picked LibreWolf which ships with uBlock Origin. Brave is a disappointing choice because it supports multi-level marketing pyramid schemes which says enough about their moral compass.

    --
    ✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Brave marketing has gone crazy to convince people it's less dodgy than Firefox. Come on!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Seems like a strange choice. If anything i would've expected them to just use a firefox fork or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 38 points 1 year ago

    Firefox is bad, Brave is evil. Why did they decide switching is a good idea?

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    That's gonna be a no from me, dawg

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    "we replaced the browser with ad ware, that we even admit we had to ship settings to minimise its malware effect"

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    one of the worst distros ever so I guess this is pretty obvious choice and telling to some.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    A bad move. But again i hate that many distros have a default browser and they don't let you choose.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel like if they were gonna go chromium, they should have gone with Vivaldi. It may not be open source but it's not doing a crypto scam. Waterfox would have also been a good choice, probably better because it's Gecko.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The distro sucks anyway. They ship really fucking old packages, even more so than Debian or other stable distros.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Not sure why they don't just ship Firefox with extensions like uBlock pre-installed

    Edit: it looks like they're heavily tweaking Brave regardless. I doubt this move was for technical reasons

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Wow, never recommending zorin to anyone again. Switching from gecko to chromium is a dumb move.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    the everyday linux distro that is famous for asking people for money for their pro version, cause they know most of the userbase is coming from windows and doesnt know that everything is free?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [+] 14 points 1 year ago
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Maybe this was not supposed to have been posted until April fool's day. Silly Zorin was too early for the joke.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›