all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 99 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've been seeing it pop up more in embedded/PC based devices. Seems to be replacing Windows XP and the other embedded Windows versions. Guess Microsoft wants too much for those licenses.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I used to run 8.1 embedded as my desktop and honestly if my exoerience with it was anything to go by windows embedded has been only requiring more resources while losing features that make having a separate embedded edition make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Beats the hell out of paying Microsoft so you can keep running your business.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Commercial Windows licenses aren't typically covered by the equipment installers (or if they are, the cost is passed on to you instead of subsidizing it), have expiration dates, and you'll want security updates.

    I think the comment had the implication that the system would be running on Windows if not Ubuntu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Licensing and also more licensing!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It can vary, but there are multiple licenses at the enterprise level with varying agreements and costs. Not just the OS for your server, but software, services, end user devices, and other random things that most folks never think about because they don't have to.

    In some cases FOSS can take a big chunk out of those costs or even eliminate them entirely if you have good staff that knows their stuff and your business doesn't need or can make it's own niche software/systems. If you build it in-house, you have to support and maintain it but it's still often cheaper than many paid solutions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    If you're as big as Wendy's you probably use volume licensing. While perpetual licenses are available via volume licensing, many businesses choose a subscription model instead. There's advantages to both depending on your use case. Wendys corporate policies may also require a support contract from vendors, which can get pricy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    TIL one Wendy's uses Ubuntu

  • source
  • Seems a bit heavy to use full Ubuntu for a single application appliance, but I guess it’s still probably better than Windows.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    smart. 1000% less problems than windows and 5000% more secure

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    -900% problems..... Not sure you thought that through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wonder if Wendy's donates back to the project. Ive seen so many companies use Foss software and not pay anything and it pisses me off every time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Thanks for sharing, always nice to see!

    But nowadays I'd be surprised if one of these display devices ran Windows or some similar crap that is NOT Linux.

    Ubuntu/Canonical did, imho, the right thing to offer paid support for what is otherwise a free OS. That's what companies care for, that cannot afford a full IT employee or even department. Of course Redhat et. al. also offer that but Ubuntu seems more suitable for smaller solutions?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That’s what companies care for, that cannot afford a full IT employee or even department.

    I doubt those companies can afford paid support from the likes of Cannonical and Red Hat - their licenses are solely for other at-scale companies to write off expenses and shift blame if something hits the fan.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Gross. Dont buy from evil corporations

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It's a socialism for me not thee business model.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Wow! I can't believe a company would use an OS.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I had a frosty once

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    So does Panda E

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Ubuntu for a kiosk is really dumb though. I guess it's still better than windows.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I'm running a full version of Ubuntu on my Orange Pi 5 Plus, which is roughly the same as a Raspberry Pi 5 and it runs fine, so that thing could easilly be hardware in same class of power as a Raspberry Pi 5 or entry level intel Mini-PC and run Ubuntu.

    That said, it would still be an SBC that costs about $120.

    In my experience, a $40 SBC can't run more than Armbian and would be better off with a lightweight distro running a lighter window manager.

  • source
  • parent