I was expecting the child process joke, but this one got me good.

I bet you can buy indulgences to be root

The more you look at it the worse it gets.

But for me the most obvious tell is the edge of the desk. SD focuses too much on local details, so the foreground edge is not in-line with the background edge.

Anything with straight lines and precise angles is the nemesis of these particular algorithms.

Absolutely, yes. The screens generally look shopped in though but there's that one angular AI-like glitch on the top one. The heap of backrests and screens in the back, right, also looks funky. Is that table floating? Also, that's not actually the pope compare the ear.

I think it's SDXL which actually got quite good at hands but that doesn't mean that it suddenly knows what anything in any background looks like. Technical objects generally aren't its strengths. The Eiffel Tower is always fun, it seems like it's trying to make it into an organic canopy, if you want proper results for such things you have to train it first (or download a lora).

@swag_money @Gork

What on earth are you talking about? What warped screens in the background? What funky edges?

As for "cables terminate randomly on the desk" my brother in christ have you ever actually seen a server room? They're not "terminating randomly" they're running behind the rackmount terminal screen.

I honestly thought it was real too until I looked at it, like drip pope and sadly, if you think it's real for a second, it can be published. This is the real problem with AI images.

The were incredibly good, it would have fooled me.