top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 113 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Lmao, bruh. How do people keep praising a language where messing up a space breaks everything and there is no real type system?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The whitespace doesn't bother me. Any IDE worth a damn will manage that for you. As for the type system, yeah, I strongly prefer static typing, but for simpler projects I can see the convenience of it.

    My real issue with Python comes with managing a development environment when multiple developers are working on it. Dependency management in Python is a headache, and while in theory, virtual envs should help with synchronizing environments from machine to machine, I still find it endlessly fiddly with a bunch of things that can go wrong that are hard to diagnose.

    Python is great for small scripts, proofs-of-concept, and such, but I wouldn't write anything more heavy-duty than that in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You can totally write heavy duty things if you know what you're doing: use type hints, static checkers, tests, etc. It just takes a bit more effort and care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    But why would I use something that takes more effort and care?

    I'm sure you're right and it's possible, but if I don't have to fix another python project at work I'll be in heaven.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because "more effort and care" in Python is still way less of a pain in the ass than the minimum enforced boilerplate necessary in most other languages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    Yeah, working on python projects professionally is always a nightmare of configuring env variables and trying to get your system to perfectly match the reference dev system. I find Node.js projects to often be the simplest and most pain free to setup, but even compiled languages like C# and Java are often easier to get up and going than python.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Haha: "A space breaks everything." Fuck YES! Are you kidding me‽ It's one of the best features!

    Why? Because it's so easy to see. In other languages you've got semicolons which are surprisingly difficult to notice when they're missing. Depending on the situation (or if you're just new to programming) you could spend a great deal of time troubleshooting your code only to find out that you're missing a semicolon. It's frustrating and it makes you feel stupid which is never a good thing for people who are new programming.

    Types are in a different category altogether with seemingly infinite reasons why you'd want a feature-rich, low-level type system and also why you'd want to avoid that.

    IMHO, the point of Python is to be a simple language that's quick to write yet also very powerful and speedy when you need it to be (by taking advantage of modules written in C or better, Rust). If it had a complex type system I think it would significantly lower the value of the language. Just like how when I see an entire code repo using Pydantic and type hints everywhere it makes the code unnecessarily complex (just use type hints where it matters 🙄).

    I'm not saying using type hints on everything is a terrible thing... I just think it makes the code harder to read which, IMHO defeats the point of using Python and adds a TON of complexity to the language.

    The promise of type hints is that they'll enable the interpreter to significantly speed up certain things and reduce memory utilization by orders of magnitude at some point in the future. When that happens I'll definitely be reevaluating the situation but right now there doesn't seem to be much point.

    For reference, I've been coding in Python for about 18 years now and I've only ever encountered a bug (in production) that would've been prevented by type hints once. It was a long time ago, before I knew better and didn't write unit tests.

    These days when I'm working on code that requires type hints (by policy; not actual necessity) it feels like doing situps. Like, do I really need to add a string type hint to a function called, parse_log()? LOL!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    I don't mean this insultingly because lots of programming jobs don't require this and for the ones that do we still tend to all start here, but in all honesty this sounds like it's coming from someone who's never worked on a large project maintained by multiple people over time.

    First of all, the hysteria over semicolons is ridiculous when JavaScript, Typescript, C#, Java, Go, Swift, etc. etc. wil all automatically highlight missing semicolons, if not automatically insert them for you when paired with an IDE and standard linter. On top of that, JavaScript and Typescript do not require semicolons at all, but they are still used alongside braces, because they make your code more scannable, readable, and moveable.

    Secondly, without type safety your code is no longer predictable or maintainable. If you're working to quickly sketch out some new fangled logic for a research paper it's one thing, if you need to write test code so that your codebase can be tested an infinite number of times by other coders and whatever CI/ CD pipelines to make sure that nothing's broken, then all of the sudden you start seeing the value in strict typing.

    Honestly, complaining about type safety adding "extra code" is a complaint that almost every coder has when they start out, before you eventually realize that all that "extra code" isn't just boiler plate for no reason but is adding specificity, predictability, reusability, and maintainability to your code base.

    When defining types looked like this it was one thing:

    String name = new String("Charles Xavier");

    But when it looks like this, there's no reason not to use strong typing:

    const name = "Charles Xavier";

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 75 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I've learned python after CPP... And I can't #even remember all the cases when I thought "damn, I wish I could've just used pointers"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Cobol

    💰💰💰💰💰

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Every time I use python it makes me want to throw my computer through my window. Doesn't happen with other languages. Pip fucking sucks it seems like every time I want to install dependencies for a project there is one that throws a compilation error when installing it. Like, why does it not try to download the version of the package that works with my version of python?? It doesn't even tell me why it failed!!!

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    i still do not fathom what on earth you people are doing to get these issues.
    The worst annoyances i've had with python is just running the correct commands to install stuff, which is no different from working with git.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Java is in a completely different leagues to the rest of these.

    Whatever you think Java sucks at, the other languages mentioned here suffer from much worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Let me guess. Are the Java and Python programmers happy after because they leave up their technical debt for someone else to resolve? 🤭

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Y'all need Qt Creator: C++ for under the hood and Javascript for the UI. Virtually nonexistent base of coders who can do both competently and if you're not careful you end up moving to Finland because of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Python managed to turn me away before I wrote a single line of code.

    Running an already functional project took me nearly two hours and three separate tutorials.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What's so difficult?

    import project as p
    
    p.run()
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Hmm, I follow the package's readme and only get invalid command errors.

    Gotta install the pip dependencies.

    Oh but first you need to create a venv or everything will be global. Why isn't that local by default like with npm? Hell if I know!

    Ah but before that I need to install the RIGHT version of Python. The one I already have likely won't do. And that takes AGES.

    Oh but even then still just tells me the command is invalid. Ah, great, I live CLIs. Now I've gotta figure out PATH variables again and add python there. Also pip maybe?

    Now I can follow the readme's instructions! Assuming I remember to manually open the venv first.

    But it only gives me errors about missing pieces. Ugh. But I thought I installed the pip dependencies!

    Oh, but turns out there's something about a text file full of another different set of dependencies that I need to explicitly mention via CLI or they won't be installed. And the readme didn't mention that, because that's apparently "obvious". No it's not; I'm just a front-end developer trying to run the darn thing.

    Okay. Now it runs. Finally. But there's a weird error. There might be something wrong with my .env file. Maybe if I add a print statement to debug... Why isn't it showing up?

    Oooh, I need to fully rebuild if I want it to show up, and the hot reload functionality that you can pass a command line argument for doesn't work... Cool cool cool cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    You can't see the C one because it went by too quickly.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If Python has no haters I'm dead.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I can't speak for others, but the python3 transition wiped the smile off my face for awhile there.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why? The most annoying thing that I remember about it was popular modules that hadn't been ported yet. In essence, a temporary problem; growing pains.

    The Unicode/string/bytes changes were welcome (to me). But that might just be because I had actually encountered situations where I had to deal with seemingly endless complexity and ambiguity related to Unicode stuff and encodings. Python 3 made everything much more logical 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›