top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 91 points 2 years ago

Alternative heading; Greedy CEOs on their 5 holiday mansion refusal to pay living wages could disrupt EV rollout.

  • source
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don’t think many environmentalists are like, “My dream is a car-dominated society but electric.” It’s an improvement, to be sure, but I feel like every (realistic) environmentalist would prefer trains and trolleys to planes and cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This seems like one of those situations where every leftist is like, “I think about unions, transportation, and housing.” and the media somehow decides the left is hellbent on forcing people to attend sensitivity training in Smart Cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This reminded me of a person online talking about how they didn’t understand why tree-huggers appreciated wind power despite the bird strike numbers - well because climate change itself is a much bigger fish!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Or also because of the bird strike numbers. I believe they are quite low.

    Many such complaints were based on an old wind farm in Altamont Pass that did have a serious problem. However it was a mountain pass on a migratory bird route and the towers were open framework with plenty of spots for roosting. Once we stopped those two things, bird losses dropped precipitously.

    I believe people making those complaints have also lost perspective. My support for anything to further reduce the remaining bird losses is not inconsistent with the belief that we already well into a better spot.

    People making those complaints also seem unable to expand their minds to the huge bird loss from the polluted air pr if we didn’t

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Why should we compromise on labor rights in favor of environmentalism? The latter wouldn't be such a problem if the former had been taken care of decades ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    EVs don't save the environment, they save the car industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Car industry isn't going anywhere, regardless. Plus, do you really think vehicles with less maintenance and longer lifespans is going to save the industry?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Environmentalists support it because they support workers rights. Also, if you really care for the environment you know that EVs are not the solution and will never be the solution for the environment, just the car companies.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    EVs are not THE solution, there is no one solution. EVs are a PART of the solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

    They have their part in the solution, but the more we rely on ev the less we do more important stuff like public transportation, walkable cities, proper zoning, less unnecessary office time, etc. If we remove every petrol car ever and just make them all ev we will still have an enormous problem, but while we doing that we necessarily neglect everything else. Making the society not car-centric is more important, that's where all the focus should be. Remaining cars should obviously be electric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I don't know why you're being downvoted, you're right. Something as massive as climate change requires extreme change from us. A band-aid fix like EVs is only going to give the illusion of a solution. Reducing suburban sprawl and expanding mass transit will do much more for the environment than EVs ever could.

    Yes, EVs are a good step, but they're little more than a compromise, we should be pushing to reduce our reliance on cars and semis as much as possible. The focus on EVs makes some people lose sight of this. People seem to be reluctant to change, holding out for some drop-and-swap fix that will solve everything. At the end of the day though, even the greenest car is way less energy efficient than the average bus, while also consuming much more road space per person.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    A more honest headline:

    Our corporate overlords don't like unions and environmentalists, so we're gonna pit those groups against each other.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A strike means less cars period. Environmentalists would be in favor of that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago*

    No shit? A strike would disrupt everything. That's kind of the point. This article is pure propaganda, appealing to environmentalists, techies, or whoever fancies EVs in an attempt to weaken the union's efforts to seek reasonable wages.

    Shame on politico for sneaking this through by masquerading it as a blight against improving the environment.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Strikes are caused by management.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    While true, management is doing the bidding of shareholders, so the ultimate responsibility lies with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Environmentalism doesn't care that much about EVs, because road infrastructure is bad, but when driving really is necessary, EVs are better. Environmentalism supports the strike, because has since long realised that workers struggle similar fights, would be a great ally and might produce popular support for environmentalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    The UAW strike will hopefully inspire an expansion of union representation in the workforce.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Are they implying that these corps would stop or slow making ev because some workers want more pay? Oh yeah you plebs want to be able to survive why do I destroy the planet see how you like that /s. Like we cant do both and it's zero sum.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Auto workers want to be paid a living wage rather then having all the money going to billionaire executives? Weird, it’s almost like the workers want a roof over their head and food to eat.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Right. That's why record profits have accelerated EVs. /s. Don't fall for that nonsense.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›