This image is not mine, it's from u/Andireas_Germany on Reddit

all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There is a lower price tier of Youtube premium being tested in Europe right now that has ads, but still gives offline viewing and youtube music. This is what that is for. People who are seeing ads know exactly why they are seeing ads; because they signed up for a plan with ads. The regular plan at the regular price is still ad free.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think you're mistaken about what this lower price tier offers. It is still ad-free, except for Youtube Music which is ad-supported. If a regular YouTube video uses a song that belongs to the YouTube Music catalog, it will have ads as normal. Also, this tier doesn't offer background playback (with the phone screen turned off).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You are correct, maybe? I say maybe because I see now the original info that I was reading was speculation from last month, however, new information is sparse and every site seems to contradict the others. Honestly, now I don't know what they are doing with it. Regardless, it is a separate tier of a plan, so those that are seeing ads signed up for a plan that includes ads in some form or another. It's not like Google just started sneaking ads into the full premium tier without warning, which what this post and the others like it that I've seen are rage baiting for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So it seems they are only expecting ads in YouTube music, so I understand when they are then confused to see ads in their YouTube videos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It possibly highlights a problem that I've always had with youtube music. Anyone can label their video as "music" and it will show up in youtube music. The biggest offender are rip off artists that name themselves after existing bands and then upload "new" tracks designed to get people to give their fake band the views that the real band is getting. Then, presumably, they take their ad revenue and peace out. It bothers me, because I'll look up an artist and there will be some crazy ass Middle Eastern band putting out new "Black Sabbath" songs, polluting the artist page with bullshit. It's even worse when one of the tracks shows up in a radio station. Google really needs to separate music and video.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The literal opposite of what people¹ want then. Give me back the €5 no ads, no yt music and no off app viewing and I will consider enabling the app and remove the YouTube adblockers in my browser.

    ¹ People as in me. I am at least one people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    Bruh, why pay for Youtube in the first place? Fuck them

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    If my youtube premium gets ads its back to ad block.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Google is an advertising company, never expect anything better than that.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    This is apparently from an ad-supported tier being trialled in EU and not them sneaking ads into an ad free tier. Read comments below for more context.

    This thread was reported for being misleading but I'm going to leave it up for the context.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The only reason that I (and I suspect many many other people) pay for it is because of the value proposition of not having ads on Youtube + Youtube Music for slightly more than Spotify. They better be careful about their subscriptions because their service is also available for free. If I feel like im being ripped off, instead of them getting 12$ a month they will get 0$ and I will still get to use the service. It's different from Netflix in that in their case there is no free tier to go back to.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Free tier for YouTube = no ads with unblock origin. Free tier for Netflix = just pirate the movies and shows. There's probably a way to block ads in Spotify too idk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Fuck YouTube!

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh hell no, not after they started raising prices in other countries. I don't want to pirate again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    All you have to do is install Ublock...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why tf not. Videos get deleted at times. Or for offline watching. Lots of reasons really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Eh fair. I honestly hadn't even considered downloading from the website cuz that just doesn't feel like piracy to me. I was picturing somebody torrenting Mr beast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Ah yeah, I get what you mean. But basically anything where people cannot directly download a video but have to resort to some additional software to download the video, that's basically piracy.

    Now some people won't know about yt-dlp and the sorts, so they maybe even do go for torrents, again, why not? If you are such a fan of Mr. Beast (no judgement here) and that dude has surely hundreds if not thousands of videos by now, a torrent could include all of a series of his videos that you are interested in. So it is actually then more convenient to torrent them instead of downloading them one by one.

    Tldr different people have different interests and usecases

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's not piracy to download YouTube videos. You already do that when you watch the video on your device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    So why does the official site not allow direct downloads? Why do we need projects like yt-dlp to download? Why is YouTube constantly changing so that yt-dlp and others need to keep up to keep being able to download?

    Edit: and with that explanation nothing would be piracy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    Official site allows direct downloads, the option is just hidden from less savvy users. What you're arguing is basically the "you don't access the content as google means to, so it's piracy" shit that's used to scare people away from adblockers too

    I think piracy starts from where you start distributing restricted content to other people, to allow them to also enjoy that content. That's also very based

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I used to with vanced because I wanted background play. Originally I pirated because I didn't agree with PAYING for a feature that is free on desktop and was free on mobile until Google deliberately disabled it. Then Vanced stopped working because, you know, and revanced just didn't work for me. Revanced worked for boost for reddit after, well, you know, but not YouTube. So I actually eventually I started paying to have no ads and it turns out the other features like the not-really-sponsorblock and queuing are pretty useful. And I don't use Netflix or the others (I don't watch TV) so being a YouTube power user justified paying. I don't mind paying. But if they do show ads (I read the context) on standard premium I'm not paying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    When I had Premium for the whole family, they were also showing ads AND still using trackers.

    I emailed Google support about it, and they said it was a "bug". I cancelled soon after.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I'm always so appalled and offended when I go on YouTube and there's a 60 and even 90 second and. Wtf year so you think this is YouTube? I'm not watching 60 seconds of ass. Funny thing is if I keep pressing back and play, after 2 or 3 times it goes down to a 5 second ad, so I at least know how to bypass those long ones

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Been using NewPipe for years. What are ads?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I have grandfathered in YouTube premium from like 10 years ago because of a business cell phone promotion deal. I have not seen a single ad yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    This is something new they’re testing primarily in EU. There are plans to separate the premium into tiers and one tier will have ads. Even in the US, there are currently ads in your home feed such as product placement videos. When I contacted support about this, they told me they knew they were ads, it’s just that it does not interfere with watching videos. Disgusting fucking company.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I guess it's not premium enough.

    It reminds me of Unlimited data mobile services in which the data is not turned off or surcharged but throttled to a crawl after a limited time. We've not since been able to get a straight answer from any of the major telecom providers.

    Marx predicts enshittification in Das Kapital

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Wow, they really downsized the Barbie… same price?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Some of them may be hardware related - any time I sign in to one of my TCL TV's with a Premium account, the first result in any search is always one marked Sponsored. It's gash, but it doesn't happen on any other of my devices than that TCL TV which makes me think it's some sort of vendor problem.

    Either way, YouTube/Google/Alphabet/whoever won't give a fuck so if it's that bad, then vote with your wallet.

  • source