I have no horse in the race regarding spoilers since I tend to avoid news and social media completely when the time zone prevents me from watching live. I do however, have some feedback about the post-race thread, anyway.

Regardless of allowing spoilers or not, I feel naming the official sticky post race thread something like "GP X Post-Race Discussion" would be more appropriate and inviting for conversation than "Max Verstappen Wins GP X".

I know it's a small thing, but this season especially I don't have that much to say about Max winning another one and it would be clearer that the thread is supposed to be used for general post race talk if it had a more open general name.

Perhaps that's just me.

Would agree with others that it's more useful to have the text of articles pasted either in the post body or the comments along with the link and that social media type posts should include a screenshot with an accompanying link.

Also will the posting of short highlight clips be allowed? I always found the streamable links useful on the old site.

Spoilers are allowed and even live replays would be amazing like we used to have back in the day on reddit, you could tag guys and get replays in like 5mins. Stay off social if you don't want to catch live news.

Paywall articles not allowed... unless content is posted as a comment by OP.

International articles allowed, preferably with translation.

Thanks mods/lemmings leaders!

The other instance has a rule regarding piracy, will this instance follow suit or do something different?

Thanks for the work you guys are putting in!

I don't care about spoilers and think that spending effort policing that is wasted. People who don't want spoilers simply need to avoid social media. I dislike titles such as "Spa winner says it was harder than it looks" Just say it's Verstappen in the title, it's more interesting and easier to determine if you want to actually read the post or participate in its' discussion.

Concerning your questions:

• I personally dislike paywalled articled but there is good content behind those articles and it's only fair to also give attention to those sites because otherwise only clickbait will be left. Posting the full content sounds like a long term problem with copyright. A short summary to get a discussion going sounds plenty good.

• I'm fine with non English links, provide a title tranlsation and I'll see if want to read it and find a translation if it's a language I don't speak. (Speaking Dutch in the Verstappen era is rather fun ofcourse)

• Personally I would prefer an image of the social meda post as the main thing, with perhaps a link to the source below it. Not the other way around. But as long as an image is supplied so I don't need to go to that social media thing I'm happy.