▲ 82 ▼ Internet Archive | Software Engineer, Archiving & Data Services (Remote) (app.trinethire.com) submitted 2 years ago by SmartmanApps@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev 7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They can hire? I thought they were in danger of getting wiped out by legal costs. Have charges been dropped? Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know that license does nothing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] hector@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Putting a license on a comment isn’t how licensing works. One party can’t unilaterally decide we are in a contract (what a license is). If they moved their comment behind a wall and required clicking “I agree” then it would be a valid agreement. It’s the same thing as people posting “don’t use my data” in their Facebook wall. It’s not how legal agreements work. Any AI crawler will just suck up their data regardless of them putting a license in their comments. If they truly want to stop AI from using their comment, they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. Only a couple of bots respect that file anyway permalink fedilink source parent [+] onlinepersona@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago You know that comment does nothing? Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know that license does nothing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] hector@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Putting a license on a comment isn’t how licensing works. One party can’t unilaterally decide we are in a contract (what a license is). If they moved their comment behind a wall and required clicking “I agree” then it would be a valid agreement. It’s the same thing as people posting “don’t use my data” in their Facebook wall. It’s not how legal agreements work. Any AI crawler will just suck up their data regardless of them putting a license in their comments. If they truly want to stop AI from using their comment, they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. Only a couple of bots respect that file anyway permalink fedilink source parent [+] onlinepersona@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago You know that comment does nothing? Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent
[+] hector@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Putting a license on a comment isn’t how licensing works. One party can’t unilaterally decide we are in a contract (what a license is). If they moved their comment behind a wall and required clicking “I agree” then it would be a valid agreement. It’s the same thing as people posting “don’t use my data” in their Facebook wall. It’s not how legal agreements work. Any AI crawler will just suck up their data regardless of them putting a license in their comments. If they truly want to stop AI from using their comment, they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. Only a couple of bots respect that file anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Putting a license on a comment isn’t how licensing works. One party can’t unilaterally decide we are in a contract (what a license is). If they moved their comment behind a wall and required clicking “I agree” then it would be a valid agreement. It’s the same thing as people posting “don’t use my data” in their Facebook wall. It’s not how legal agreements work. Any AI crawler will just suck up their data regardless of them putting a license in their comments. If they truly want to stop AI from using their comment, they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. Only a couple of bots respect that file anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server. Only a couple of bots respect that file anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[+] onlinepersona@programming.dev -10 points 2 years ago You know that comment does nothing? Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent
[–] netizen@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago I don't see the date of the offer, but they're in the (bad) news these days https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/internet-archive-hacked-data-breach-impacts-31-million-users/ permalink fedilink source
[–] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago They better hire a cyber security engineer tbh permalink fedilink source
all 8 comments