83
Hear me out: A scripting language that compiles to bash or sh (any suggestions?) (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

why?

Because bash feels clunky to write and work with for anything non-trivial, especially compared to other scripting languages.

Why not another scripting language (no compile necessary)?

Because bash and sh are installed nearly everywhere. Any other scripting language means the user is required to have that installed, and that is far less likely to be the case.

If I could write my scripts in a nice syntax, but be sure my users will be able to use it effortlessly by distributing to them compiled versions, then that would make both of our lives easier!

Thoughts? Are there any languges that do this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Not only that it's basically everywhere, but even if it's not, you can compile it using something like nuitka and still use it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Huh, why doesn't python just ship this? Managing python installs is annoying as hell.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I would guess mostly because python interpretes are just about everywhere.

    Also the binaries compiled with nuitka end up being much bigger in size. A simple script of a few kb can and up in the hundreds of mb when you start compiling the dependencies, so it's not a perfect solution.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent