▲ 837 ▼ ‘TRUMP WON!’ Proud Boy Who Told Judge He Was ‘Changed Man’ Raises Fist and Shouts MAGA Slogan On Way to 10-Year Prison Sentence (www.mediaite.com) submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 31 points 2 years ago (3 children) He'd need to be tried again for purgory which he very well might be permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Nougat@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago (4 children) I don't think he was under oath at the time he made that statement, so perjury is not a concern. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 child) That’s not how it works. His statement out of court can be used as evidence that his statements in court were false (perjury). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago Probably not. You're allowed to lie in "general" speech (not a legal term). If he had made one statement under oath, and a mutually exclusive statement, also under oath, then one of those statements would be perjury. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) So he didn't commit pierogi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Juvyn00b@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Was he pragante? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Unless he was in Prague. permalink fedilink source parent [–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I love Perogies! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carvex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What if he literally vomited on them? He purged all over the court permalink fedilink source parent [–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago But an outburst in court can be considered contempt. The judge could have marched him back in for that one but it probably would have been seen as petty. permalink fedilink source parent [–] derpo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Lol purgatory might be in his future anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago I read that as purgatory at first and got a little confused permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago (4 children) I don't think he was under oath at the time he made that statement, so perjury is not a concern. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 child) That’s not how it works. His statement out of court can be used as evidence that his statements in court were false (perjury). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago Probably not. You're allowed to lie in "general" speech (not a legal term). If he had made one statement under oath, and a mutually exclusive statement, also under oath, then one of those statements would be perjury. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) So he didn't commit pierogi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Juvyn00b@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Was he pragante? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Unless he was in Prague. permalink fedilink source parent [–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I love Perogies! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carvex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What if he literally vomited on them? He purged all over the court permalink fedilink source parent [–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago But an outburst in court can be considered contempt. The judge could have marched him back in for that one but it probably would have been seen as petty. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 child) That’s not how it works. His statement out of court can be used as evidence that his statements in court were false (perjury). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago Probably not. You're allowed to lie in "general" speech (not a legal term). If he had made one statement under oath, and a mutually exclusive statement, also under oath, then one of those statements would be perjury. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago Probably not. You're allowed to lie in "general" speech (not a legal term). If he had made one statement under oath, and a mutually exclusive statement, also under oath, then one of those statements would be perjury. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) So he didn't commit pierogi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Juvyn00b@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Was he pragante? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Unless he was in Prague. permalink fedilink source parent [–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I love Perogies! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Unless he was in Prague. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I love Perogies! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What if he literally vomited on them? He purged all over the court permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago But an outburst in court can be considered contempt. The judge could have marched him back in for that one but it probably would have been seen as petty. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derpo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Lol purgatory might be in his future anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago I read that as purgatory at first and got a little confused permalink fedilink source parent