▲ 787 ▼ Australia bans social media for under 16s (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world 224 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) That would require us paying one parent enough to cover the other parent being a child care expert. But nobody gets to profit off of that so fuck society, everybody works, and nobody gets community goods except the wealthy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) if social media is fediverse, you're right; if social media is agents of surveillance capitalism, fuck social media what's "social" about what most people call social media? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) even YouTube got in an exception list. So it's not an "all or nothing" approach, it seems. Lemmy is too small for governments to care permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago but but that requires actually effort and budget that we'd have to take away from Australian oligarchs! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) A social safety net you say... like a place we could gather all the children to teach them things and let them play under supervision? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? No! They can have their own age appropriate place to learn and play under supervision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This isn't even delegating. It's more of an equivalent of stuffing your fingers into your ear holes and going "nanananan CAN'T HEAR YOU" permalink fedilink source parent [–] BangCrash@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago Parents should be Parenting? If they haven't been parenting what have they been doing for the last 40 years? And if thwy have been parenting how's that workout for us so far? There's been no age ban on social media since the internet was founded but there's record mental health crisis on young people. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Badeendje@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago Yeah! Parents should totally be allowed to give their car keys to their 14 year old to go out and drive drunk if they feel their kid can handle it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) That would require us paying one parent enough to cover the other parent being a child care expert. But nobody gets to profit off of that so fuck society, everybody works, and nobody gets community goods except the wealthy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) if social media is fediverse, you're right; if social media is agents of surveillance capitalism, fuck social media what's "social" about what most people call social media? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) even YouTube got in an exception list. So it's not an "all or nothing" approach, it seems. Lemmy is too small for governments to care permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago but but that requires actually effort and budget that we'd have to take away from Australian oligarchs! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) A social safety net you say... like a place we could gather all the children to teach them things and let them play under supervision? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? No! They can have their own age appropriate place to learn and play under supervision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) if social media is fediverse, you're right; if social media is agents of surveillance capitalism, fuck social media what's "social" about what most people call social media? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) even YouTube got in an exception list. So it's not an "all or nothing" approach, it seems. Lemmy is too small for governments to care permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago but but that requires actually effort and budget that we'd have to take away from Australian oligarchs! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) A social safety net you say... like a place we could gather all the children to teach them things and let them play under supervision? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? No! They can have their own age appropriate place to learn and play under supervision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) if social media is fediverse, you're right; if social media is agents of surveillance capitalism, fuck social media what's "social" about what most people call social media? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) even YouTube got in an exception list. So it's not an "all or nothing" approach, it seems. Lemmy is too small for governments to care permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) even YouTube got in an exception list. So it's not an "all or nothing" approach, it seems. Lemmy is too small for governments to care permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) even YouTube got in an exception list. So it's not an "all or nothing" approach, it seems. Lemmy is too small for governments to care permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago even "crash course" alone is enough of a reason to keep YouTube accessible permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago but but that requires actually effort and budget that we'd have to take away from Australian oligarchs! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) A social safety net you say... like a place we could gather all the children to teach them things and let them play under supervision? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? No! They can have their own age appropriate place to learn and play under supervision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? No! They can have their own age appropriate place to learn and play under supervision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? No! They can have their own age appropriate place to learn and play under supervision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) But what about those Parental Responsibilities you were talking about earlier? Are you saying we now need extra social safety nets for kids who don't fit the mold and get bullied? Extra places for them to learn and play under supervision? Because I don't think that's going to be economical without boarding them there, away from their parents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you do want a nanny state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Funny, conservatives would absolutely include telling parents how to raise their kids in the definition of a Nanny State. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This isn't even delegating. It's more of an equivalent of stuffing your fingers into your ear holes and going "nanananan CAN'T HEAR YOU" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago Parents should be Parenting? If they haven't been parenting what have they been doing for the last 40 years? And if thwy have been parenting how's that workout for us so far? There's been no age ban on social media since the internet was founded but there's record mental health crisis on young people. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Badeendje@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago Yeah! Parents should totally be allowed to give their car keys to their 14 year old to go out and drive drunk if they feel their kid can handle it. permalink fedilink source parent