you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I think it really depends. Functions break up the visual flow, so if you need to look at multiple functions to visualize one conceptual process then it can be less efficient

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Yes. I learned this from Haskell. I like Haskell, but it has a lot of very granular functions.

    Earlier comment said that breaking up 1 function into 3 improves readability? Well, if you really want readability then break it up into 30 functions using Haskell. Your single function with 25 lines will become 30 functions, so readable (/s).

    In truth, there's a balance between the two. Breaking things up into function does have advantages, but, as you say, it makes it more likely that you'll have to jump around a lot to understand a single process.

  • source
  • parent