▲ 763 ▼ DOJ says Google must sell Chrome to crack open its search monopoly (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by moonleay@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) How exactly is this company going to make any money? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) The judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) How exactly is this company going to make any money? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) The judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea? permalink fedilink source parent