▲ 85 ▼ Child abuse Facebook group posting about your province (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by 35276throwaway@sh.itjust.works to c/alberta@lemmy.ca 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments I’m a researcher. to my knowledge pji is a type of law firm or legal fund, unconfirmed.
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (5 children) What are MAPs? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] JustLuck@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think it's "minor attracted person". So pedophiles who went all out on: its not me that's the problem, but society... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the original purpose of that phrase, was to differentiate between people who act on those attractions, and those who understand it's wrong and refrain from doing so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue is using the same kind of language as like "Person of Color", as if pedophilia is an identity rather than an illness. If we truly want a neutral clinical name, we'd say something like "Minor Attraction Disorder". It's something that's only permissible if you are actively seeking help and self control like any other disorder that's prone to harm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they're trying to combat. The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you're referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I'm sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago That's the thing, you shouldn't be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don't say "I'm a Person of Depression" you say "I have depression". If you're serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don't declare it like an identity to be proud of. And if you don't see it as a problem, you're just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago a bunch of assholes trying to equate LGBT people to pedos. false flag operation, or actual pedos? both. permalink fedilink source parent [–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago They wouldn't do well in prison, Mister Geek. permalink fedilink source parent [+] proper@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago Criminals permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JustLuck@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think it's "minor attracted person". So pedophiles who went all out on: its not me that's the problem, but society... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the original purpose of that phrase, was to differentiate between people who act on those attractions, and those who understand it's wrong and refrain from doing so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue is using the same kind of language as like "Person of Color", as if pedophilia is an identity rather than an illness. If we truly want a neutral clinical name, we'd say something like "Minor Attraction Disorder". It's something that's only permissible if you are actively seeking help and self control like any other disorder that's prone to harm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they're trying to combat. The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you're referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I'm sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago That's the thing, you shouldn't be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don't say "I'm a Person of Depression" you say "I have depression". If you're serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don't declare it like an identity to be proud of. And if you don't see it as a problem, you're just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the original purpose of that phrase, was to differentiate between people who act on those attractions, and those who understand it's wrong and refrain from doing so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue is using the same kind of language as like "Person of Color", as if pedophilia is an identity rather than an illness. If we truly want a neutral clinical name, we'd say something like "Minor Attraction Disorder". It's something that's only permissible if you are actively seeking help and self control like any other disorder that's prone to harm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they're trying to combat. The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you're referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I'm sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago That's the thing, you shouldn't be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don't say "I'm a Person of Depression" you say "I have depression". If you're serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don't declare it like an identity to be proud of. And if you don't see it as a problem, you're just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue is using the same kind of language as like "Person of Color", as if pedophilia is an identity rather than an illness. If we truly want a neutral clinical name, we'd say something like "Minor Attraction Disorder". It's something that's only permissible if you are actively seeking help and self control like any other disorder that's prone to harm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they're trying to combat. The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you're referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I'm sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago That's the thing, you shouldn't be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don't say "I'm a Person of Depression" you say "I have depression". If you're serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don't declare it like an identity to be proud of. And if you don't see it as a problem, you're just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they're trying to combat. The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you're referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I'm sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago That's the thing, you shouldn't be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don't say "I'm a Person of Depression" you say "I have depression". If you're serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don't declare it like an identity to be proud of. And if you don't see it as a problem, you're just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago That's the thing, you shouldn't be identifying as a person attracted to minors. You don't say "I'm a Person of Depression" you say "I have depression". If you're serious about outlining the minor attraction as a problem you have to struggle with, don't declare it like an identity to be proud of. And if you don't see it as a problem, you're just enabling pedophilia. The people inflicted with it need to admit they have an illness to get treated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago a bunch of assholes trying to equate LGBT people to pedos. false flag operation, or actual pedos? both. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago They wouldn't do well in prison, Mister Geek. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] proper@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent