submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

Also checkout my new community: !tech_memes@lemmy.world

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

That is not a feature of proprietary software. That is a feature of an organisation. It only makes sense to make software for a profit in an organisation, so that's why there's so many of those. FOSS also has a lot of organisations, which are also pretty often used btw, but they are not required.

Not having to rely on an approval by any entity is a big thing for people fucking around with stuff. And fucking around with stuff makes one good at that stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I don't disagree that it is a feature of organization, but if you're talking about creating a product that has been designed around a common philosophy and UX, that is diametrically opposed to fucking around with stuff. There's a place for that and it does improve people's skills, I also don't disagree there. All I'm saying is there exists a tendency for software produced by organizations to adhere to a UX philosophy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments