It's more viable for renters than people who have to sell a house no one will buy but is too much of their net worth for them to feel like they can walk away from it.

In practice, sure, the situation is actually similar but the homeowners won't feel like it is and humans are mostly illogical.

There won't be much to pick up after it's destroyed by mother Gaia.

They should have voted then, or if they did vote, vote a different way. America is going to get the government they deserve.

Edit: and those poor people, those people are the cost of others’ decisions. Oh well. Sucks to be American

I think global warming as a term is not great, because it fails at communicating the end result of the overall average temperature increase, which is more chaotic weather on account of the increased energy present in the system. Sometimes this will mean temporary local reductions in temperature, and sometimes it will mean unusually cold years in places. Don't give people the option to use 'bUt iT's cOlDeR tHiS yEAr sO hOw cAn gLoBaL wArMiNg bE rEaL' as an easy argument.

Climate change is the more accurate term, but I do prefer terms that more accurately communicate the severity of the situation, such as the climate crisis, for example.