▲ 347 ▼ Threads' New Terms and Conditions Affects the Fediverse (wedistribute.org) submitted 2 years ago* by deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml [M] to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml 161 comments fedilink hide all child comments This shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.
[+] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml [S] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Altering the language of a service policy (or, writing a new one) is usually a good indication that something is indeed about to change at a larger level. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago It's also an indication they're following US law. They can't collect data without stating it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] danielton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here... What's to stop them from scraping the Fediverse without federating? If they really want the data, they could very well find a way. At least they're spelling it out here and announced an attempt at proper federation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago The article discusses this, a bit. One of the other platforms is considering an enhancement to require request signatures on non-ActivityPub APIs, I.E. Meta can make unsigned requests, where the server doesn't know who they're from, but only get minimal (or no) data back, or Meta can make signed requests, and instance owners get to decide what data (if any) they're okay with sharing to Meta, based on Meta's privacy policies. Beyond API's, you're talking about web scraping, which is something the industry has been handling for decades. permalink fedilink source parent [+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml [S] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Altering the language of a service policy (or, writing a new one) is usually a good indication that something is indeed about to change at a larger level. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago It's also an indication they're following US law. They can't collect data without stating it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] danielton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here... What's to stop them from scraping the Fediverse without federating? If they really want the data, they could very well find a way. At least they're spelling it out here and announced an attempt at proper federation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago The article discusses this, a bit. One of the other platforms is considering an enhancement to require request signatures on non-ActivityPub APIs, I.E. Meta can make unsigned requests, where the server doesn't know who they're from, but only get minimal (or no) data back, or Meta can make signed requests, and instance owners get to decide what data (if any) they're okay with sharing to Meta, based on Meta's privacy policies. Beyond API's, you're talking about web scraping, which is something the industry has been handling for decades. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago It's also an indication they're following US law. They can't collect data without stating it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danielton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here... What's to stop them from scraping the Fediverse without federating? If they really want the data, they could very well find a way. At least they're spelling it out here and announced an attempt at proper federation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago The article discusses this, a bit. One of the other platforms is considering an enhancement to require request signatures on non-ActivityPub APIs, I.E. Meta can make unsigned requests, where the server doesn't know who they're from, but only get minimal (or no) data back, or Meta can make signed requests, and instance owners get to decide what data (if any) they're okay with sharing to Meta, based on Meta's privacy policies. Beyond API's, you're talking about web scraping, which is something the industry has been handling for decades. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago The article discusses this, a bit. One of the other platforms is considering an enhancement to require request signatures on non-ActivityPub APIs, I.E. Meta can make unsigned requests, where the server doesn't know who they're from, but only get minimal (or no) data back, or Meta can make signed requests, and instance owners get to decide what data (if any) they're okay with sharing to Meta, based on Meta's privacy policies. Beyond API's, you're talking about web scraping, which is something the industry has been handling for decades. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent