you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 127 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I’m not even convinced it’s even real leftists posting this stuff. It often seems like astroturfing. Not only would fake leftists possibly sway undecided voters, but they also tarnish any positivity the left deserves. Win-win for the right.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'd like to think you're right.

    But I have heard borderline stuff like this in real life from people whom I know are solid progressives. (Admittedly, these are folks on my soccer team who are almost 2 decades younger than me. I can't imagine what ending their teens during a pandemic was like so I kind of expect their politics to be wildly different.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    "Borderline" is entirely different. Voting for Harris while being salty about it is a perfectly reasonable thing real progressives should do, and it's exactly the opposite of what these astroturf third-party propagandists are calling for even if the (alleged) sentiment is adjacent. That "border" is a knife edge and the difference between a genuine progressive and a[n effectively] pro-Trump useful idiot comes down to which side of it they fall off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Konnichiwa.

    I understand you are very concerned about people voting 3rd party. Considering our broken First Past The Post voting system, I get it.

    Did you know that alternative voting systems could alleviate all your worries about people who wish to vote outside the two party system? People could be free to vote how they wish, safe in the knowledge that their vote would still count against the Republicans.

    How we vote us controlled at the state level, which means we can pass this much needed reform without federal intervention. Actually, some states have already passed legislation doing away with First-past-the-post voting, and even more are in the process of passing it! Exciting times no?

    So, in conclusion, I hope you stop by my ask lemmy Post to discuss your post election commitment to replace FPTP voting in your state.

    If achieved, you wouldn't have to worry about 3rd parties anymore and your fellow citizens would be involved and contributing to the poltical process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    So, in conclusion, I hope you stop by my ask lemmy Post to discuss your post election commitment to replace FPTP voting in your state.

    Sure, I'd be happy to! But the key phrase there is "post election." IMO you should delete it and re-submit it on Wednesday.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Astroturfing exists to poison the minds of on lookers. If useful idiots didn't adopt the warped logic they wouldn't astroturf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It blows my mind that people are dumb enough for it to work but in an era of razor tight electoral margins, even a few idiots can matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Dealt with someone ostensibly from the UK advocating for not voting and after being pressed repeatedly finally worked their way down to “I’m not voting because I can’t”.

    Actual foreign election interference, and the UK has some notable Russian ties. Wouldn’t be surprised if that rube has ties to Russia or is actually on a ruble payroll

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments