this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024

426 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,250 readers

4,634 active

422 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

US copyright law 'forces researchers to explore extra-legal methods' for game preservation, say historians who are 'disappointed' after being denied a DMCA exemption (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 years ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Well, it should expire at 9 years after the work was made, but to reinforce that, it should be owned by a finite being.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

If that one person dies, then there's no one with a stake in enforcing the copyright.

9 years also seems really short. There are sequels that come out far more than 9 years after the original work.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

Sounds like motivation to get the sequel done sooner.

parent