643
It's a matter of perspective (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Once again the anarchists are the only correct group

it's like the curse of Nostradamus

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    More like the curse of nostradumbass

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    lemmy user DESTROYS the philosophical tendency of anarchism with FACTS and LOGIC and EXTREMELY mediocre WORDPLAY

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Are anarchists actually practicing anarchism if they form groups?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Anarchism is when there's one guy alone in the forest." -Mikhail Bakunin

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Did Mikhail Bakunin think that women could not be anarchists?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Of course not, if there were women in the forest they would be clearly accompanied by the Internet Argument Bear and therefore it wouldn't be anarchism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I thought the woman might be busy having three kids with one of Bakunin's disciples while still married to Bakunin.

    Dude lived an interesting life.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Iff they're not hierarchical

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Iffs in the wild make me happy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Are "Iffs" a thing? I've been missing out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    iff is the shorthand for "if and only if".

    If you said "if it is a horse it has hooves" you can infer "all horses have hooves" but not that "all hooved creatures are horses".

    Otoh if you said "iff a polygon has 3 sides, it is a triangle" you can infer that all polygons that have 3 sides are triangles and that there are no other ways to make triangles.

    edit: This was typed by sleep deprived me, I tried to fix it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Cool, TIL

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Omg I have no clue how you understood anything from my previous comment.

    It was such a mess lmao

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Well I mostly was already familiar with "if and only if" terminology from some math class many years ago. So once you said iff stands for "if and only if" I didn't really look too close at the rest of your comment because I felt like I already understood.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent