776
ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech—No Matter How Awful It Is. (www.eff.org)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

It seems I'm going into really wierd conversation.

If you let people possess it

I think you are missing the point or are a troll. Person above said that creating and/or buying is always be illigal anyway. Or you want to make easier for abusers to collect information about their future victims by destroying privacy?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Oh look, another shithead pedo apologist.

    Creating and buying is exactly what they're trying to get people to accept, incrementally, by attacking possession first. Exploiting the warped way Americans have been taught to think about morality to do it. And your sorry ass is helping him. You doing so is not acceptable AT ALL and neither is any notion of getting rid of CP possession bans.

    You will not make pedophilia socially acceptable and you will not lie to me and say that you aren't, and then go back to doing it like I know you're gonna do.

    You're evil.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Dear Faust, another one. It is so much easier to call opponent Hitler/pedophile/terrorist than counter-argue.

    This is discussion about ISP's surveillance. This is not just attacking posession. This is attacking computer that relayed data stream. Technically it is message sequence, but the fact we have discussion speaks that you doesn't care. Should postman go to jail if delivered letter contained child pornography? You say that postman should open and read every letter.

    Your only option to not look like complete troll is to somehow define posession in a way that excludes postman(ISP).

    Here's my take on your manipulation:

    You will not make espionage socially acceptable and you will not lie to me and say that you aren't, and then go back to doing so like I know you're gonna do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •