you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I know it's a damn lot easier than carbon recapture, if we're talking waste products. It's not ideal, but there is no such thing as perfect, and we shouldn't let that be the enemy of good. Nuclear fission power is part of a large group of methods to help us switch off fossil fuels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Easier"? Are you aware of the fact that radioactive waste tombs are meant to stand for millions of years? It requres a lot of territory, construction and servance charges, and lots of prays for nothing destructive happens with it in its "infinite" lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Have you tried capturing gas? As difficult as radioactive waste tombs are, they're easier than containing a specific type of air lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Read about breathing if you want to know how to capture gas. Also, about photosynthesis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you want to buy the land to plant a second Amazon, be my guest. And breathing does the exact opposite of what we want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'd rather fill land with trees than with radioactive wastes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You need a lot, lot more trees. Like several orders of magnitude. And growing trees takes longer than even building a nuclear power plant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    To be specific, growing the types of trees we would want for such a thing in such an amount that it would deal with the problems we have, assuming we stop growth of CO2 and assuming we stop burning the Amazon, would take around a hundred years.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/how-to-erase-100-years-carbon-emissions-plant-trees

    "It could take more than a hundred years to add enough mature forest to get sufficient levels of carbon reduction. Meanwhile 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) from burning fossil fuels are being added to the atmosphere every year, said Glen Peters, research director at Norway’s Center for International Climate Research."

    And need an area the size of the United States. I wasn't joking about a second Amazon.

  • source
  • parent