1772
Pope says 'backward' US conservatives replaced faith with ideology (www.euronews.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/news@lemmy.world
377 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Pope Francis condemned the "very strong, organised, reactionary attitude" in the US church and said Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Pope Francis has blasted the “backwardness” of some conservatives in the US Catholic Church, saying they have replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Francis’ comments were an acknowledgment of the divisions in the US Catholic Church, which has been split between progressives and conservatives who long found support in the doctrinaire papacies of St John Paul II and Benedict XVI, particularly on issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Not everyone who considers Deuteronomy to be scripture is Christian. For example, basically any rabbi would disagree with you.

Sure, but this thread is mostly about Christianity (the post is about the Pope and the Catholic Church).

The Deuteronomic code is literally presented as instruction from Moses to Israel as a normative set of rules for israel to follow.

Yes. I said basically this. I wrote: But the thing you quoted from Deuteronomy were instructions to the Israelites.

I don't know of similar commandments in the new testament

Because there aren't any like that.

had its fair share of religious leaders inciting sectarian wars, pogroms, persecution, etc. For example, Pope Paul IV wrote a decree that forced the Jews of Rome into a ghetto in 1555, prevented them from owning property or working most skilled jobs. The Spanish Inquisition primarily targeted Jews and Muslims who converted to Christianity under threat of exile.

And? Your next door neighbour can be a "Christian", go to church every week, etc, but then find out he's a regular thief and had murdered someone. Would you then conclude there must be a commandment somewhere in the Bible that condones stealing and murder? Or would you conclude that he didn't follow the principles of the Bible he proclaimed to believe in?

Examples of people doing bad things in the name of the Bible is not evidence of anything against the Bible. It's just an example of terrible people being manipulative, exploitative, and ultimately evil. Many people throughout history (and many alive today) have realized that many people are more willing to listen to and accept what you say when you claim it's from the Bible. These people don't care about the Bible, they just care that it's a tool they can use for manipulation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Examples of people doing bad things in the name of the Bible is not evidence of anything against the Bible.

    Christianity, and catholicism more specifically, are more than just the Bible itself.

    Religious teachings evolve over time based off of new reinterpretations of old passages, teachings from influential leaders, folk traditions that spring up, etc. Those are all part of the religion, too.

    For example, most Christians would say that the serpent in the garden of eden is Satan. Yet Genesis doesn't say anything about that, and the New Testament doesn't explicitly say it either. Mostly, it's a folk tradition some people found a couple verses you could squint at to support it.

    And particularly in the case of Catholicism, there's a world of difference between a pope issuing an official bull, and your neighbor being a catholic who happens to be a shitty person. There's a huge difference between a random person teaching to be nice to your neighbor but shitty to outsiders, and for St Jerome to do that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Christianity, and catholicism more specifically, are more than just the Bible itself.

    Catholicism yes. Christianity, no. Christianity is literally based on the Bible and a "Christian" is a follower of Christ (it's actually what the word means).

    most Christians would say that the serpent in the garden of eden is Satan. Yet Genesis doesn't say anything about that, and the New Testament doesn't explicitly say it either.

    Well, that's not exactly correct. It's true that in Genesis it doesn't say "the snake in the garden that spoke to Eve was Satan". However, Satan is referred to as "the father of the lie" and "the original serpent". Satan is the only one to directly challenge God's right to rule and the lie to Eve was the first challenge. It has nothing to do with folk tradition. There are other supporting scriptions also.

    And particularly in the case of Catholicism, there's a world of difference between a pope issuing an official bull, and your neighbor being a catholic who happens to be a shitty person.

    Yes, there is a difference in the sense that the Pope has a huge and wide reaching audience and the neighbour is mostly a nobody. But that doesn't matter when we're talking about their conduct as it relates to "doing the right thing according to God". Each person is accountable to God for their own behaviour and actions.

    On the other hand, there's an argument to be had about whether or not Catholicism should even be considered Christian anymore. There are so many doctrines and teachings that aren't in the Bible, or flat out taken from other "pagan" religions (religious syncretism). Sometimes even going against teachings in the Bible.

    Reference:

    John 8:44 "You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a murderer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of the lie."

    Revelation 12:9 "So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent