I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don't like the idea of AI giving me "facts" since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 69 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I'm very happy with kagi at the moment. Just crossed one year using it as my main search engine last week and don't see why I would go back.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Same. Using Kagi feels like surfing the old web. The first thing I did was block all Pinterest results. That alone made every search golden. 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    I hate Pinterest lol, best thing about Kagi is being able to block whole sites and it remembers your preferences. I may come back to Kagi but I didn't feel like funding their AI features development. Now Im using Searx and 4get cause they're free.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 32 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Having to signup and login to a search engines sounds like an annoying hassle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    It's a very minor annoyance and well worth it in my opinion.

    I was searching for a book quote for over a year. I tried every search engine, tried changing the terms, checking back several times every few weeks or so, but couldn't find anything even close. I tried kagi and it was literally the very first result on my very first search.

    I haven't looked back and have never had an issue finding what I'm searching for since.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    You pay instead of seeing ads, so they need the account. Remembers you, though, so you just login once. Plus they have a solution for incognito/private windows too.

    I really like it, has some cool features.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Signing up and logging in isn't a problem imo. I wouldn't even mind if I had to pay for searches, but I'm not going to make it a subscription service. Unless they add an option to do something like buy 1000 searches that never expire, its not something I'd considered. I do think they beat out competitors like google with their results pretty consistently though based on the trial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not gonna subscription my heated car seats but search is a service that costs an ongoing amount to provide. The subscription isn't significant, it's $5 a month for 300 searches (or $10 for unlimited).

    I know we've been conditioned to expect search for free, but if we want to get away from the "the user is the product" model then I think it's a good thing to have a subscription to a service that has ongoing costs to provide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Up to 300 searches. I'm not asking for free. Just for it to not be a subscription. Just sell me 300 searches.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Ah right, I get you. I wonder if they have considered this. Pretty sure their free/demo tier is 100 searches not confined to a time period so presumably the platform could handle that model.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes but then how do they get that sweet sweet recurring revenue

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I don't remember any specifics, but I think I heard there were some privacy concerns?

    Then again, there seem to be privacy concerns about pretty much anything so might not be that bad...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The concerns are about the credit card you use to pay.

    The argument is that they can associate the card with your searches.

    As far as I know they don't keep search data. I'm personally happy with them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    I think this might be it. There were also some statements by the CEO I think which didn't exactly inspire confidencenin their company - but again, I don't remember the details unfortunately

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Is it really $108/year good though for a single person (based on the tier that makes sense for me)? Just curious what other search engines you’ve used or tried and what features set it apart to make it worth spending the money on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    That really depends on your use case and how valuable web search is for your daily life.

    I've personally tried Google, Bing, DDG, Brave search, and ChatGPT. Kagi is consistently able to find what I'm searching for more quickly and accurately than anything else, which has been very valuable for me in my personal and professional life.

    It's easily worth the cost in result quality and time saving for me personally, but that doesn't mean the same will apply to you or anyone else.

    As far as stand out features, there aren't really any that I can think of. It just gives me the results I'm looking for without any bullshit to wade through.

  • source
  • parent