you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Nintendo's legal argument is that the encryption that is reverse-engineered to circumvent copy-protection is protected intellectual property.

Anyone can copy the contents of a switch ROM (more of a glorified SD card anyway) but the million-dollar question is whether their proprietary encryption can be broken legally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Isn't the encryption algorithm open? That's what matters. It's AES, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments