▲ 1005 ▼ “You will be more conservative as you grow older” (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 215 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I just gave an example of how it is meaningful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It really doesn't, though. Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space, what matters is literal positions and stances. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space Not completely. If two people occupy a similar space, it means they agreed on something. That is meaningful. It's vague, sure. But it isn't completely random nonsense like astrology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't. Someone with a "left" view and a "right" view can cancel each other out, occupying the same space as someone with a "neutral" view. It's worthless. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out, Only if the person with a left view also has a right view. And only if the other person with the right view has a left view. You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. All political measurements fall victim to that. It's a moot point. But just because some people are like that doesn't mean everyone is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. It doesn't, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It really doesn't, though. Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space, what matters is literal positions and stances. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space Not completely. If two people occupy a similar space, it means they agreed on something. That is meaningful. It's vague, sure. But it isn't completely random nonsense like astrology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't. Someone with a "left" view and a "right" view can cancel each other out, occupying the same space as someone with a "neutral" view. It's worthless. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out, Only if the person with a left view also has a right view. And only if the other person with the right view has a left view. You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. All political measurements fall victim to that. It's a moot point. But just because some people are like that doesn't mean everyone is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. It doesn't, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Two people with wildly different views can occupy the same space Not completely. If two people occupy a similar space, it means they agreed on something. That is meaningful. It's vague, sure. But it isn't completely random nonsense like astrology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't. Someone with a "left" view and a "right" view can cancel each other out, occupying the same space as someone with a "neutral" view. It's worthless. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out, Only if the person with a left view also has a right view. And only if the other person with the right view has a left view. You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. All political measurements fall victim to that. It's a moot point. But just because some people are like that doesn't mean everyone is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. It doesn't, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't. Someone with a "left" view and a "right" view can cancel each other out, occupying the same space as someone with a "neutral" view. It's worthless. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out, Only if the person with a left view also has a right view. And only if the other person with the right view has a left view. You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. All political measurements fall victim to that. It's a moot point. But just because some people are like that doesn't mean everyone is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. It doesn't, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t. Someone with a “left” view and a “right” view can cancel each other out, Only if the person with a left view also has a right view. And only if the other person with the right view has a left view. You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. Plus, someone can say they are for something, but actually not support it in reality. All political measurements fall victim to that. It's a moot point. But just because some people are like that doesn't mean everyone is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. It doesn't, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You seem confused. The point of it isn't to give a fully accurate explanation of a person's views on every topic. It's to give somebody a general idea. It doesn't, though, plus the test itself is highly flawed and biased. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t, though Sure it does. I already explained how. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago You failed to. It gives an inaccurate view that misleads the user. What matters is what a person actually supports. permalink fedilink source parent