I'm not complaining, but I didn't realize how much work it was. It makes me really respect the people who do it on a regular basis.

For example:

  • You know how to use your software, but other people don't. So you need to write documentation.
  • You can just modify the source files, but it's impractical for everyone to do that. So you need to add a config file.
  • You can just drag the output files into place, but that's impractical for everyone to do. So you need to package it.
  • You trust yourself, but distro maintainers rightfully don't. So you need to package your source code and configure the package to compile it.
  • You will abide by your idea of how the software should be used, but other people might not. So you need to pick a license.

Sometimes I think there must be an easier way, but I can't think of any. I guess it probably gets easier with experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

That's why engineers are, on average, paid more than researchers... And why research is such a nicer job.

Create robust and easy-to-use stuff is tough and you don't get much reward

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I've been attempting to build systems to make this "robustness" redundant across all my works, but I always feel there's something more that I missed. I can't tell if this task is simply never-ending or I just lack the knowledge of covering all the dots from the get-go or both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments