▲ 21 ▼ SMTP provider (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by callcc@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments Who can suggest an ethical SMTP provider for low volume transactional mail? I'm willing to pay up to 2€/month for a few hundred mails per month.
[+] Treczoks@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago (2 children) "Low volume" vs. "A few hundred mails per month" OK, what of the above? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago A few hundred a month is just a few per day. That is pretty low volume by most standards. I would say in general if the SMTP server could be replaced by a single human writing and mailing snail-mail letters by hand it qualifies as low volume. permalink fedilink source parent [–] callcc@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is something you used to be able to do for free, no problem. It's only a few of the big mail accepting companies being extra shitty about accepting mail making this tough. Looking at you Microsoft. So a few hundred mails per month is ridiculous both on storage, bandwidth and CPU consumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago A few hundred a month is just a few per day. That is pretty low volume by most standards. I would say in general if the SMTP server could be replaced by a single human writing and mailing snail-mail letters by hand it qualifies as low volume. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] callcc@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is something you used to be able to do for free, no problem. It's only a few of the big mail accepting companies being extra shitty about accepting mail making this tough. Looking at you Microsoft. So a few hundred mails per month is ridiculous both on storage, bandwidth and CPU consumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists. permalink fedilink source parent