▲ 1246 ▼ Wait a minute, we've been going about this all the wrong way! (slrpnk.net) submitted 2 years ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 217 comments fedilink hide all child comments IDF: Whoops, tee hee.
[+] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -12 points 2 years ago* (5 children) but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history. Do you admit that mass gas chambers are an effective way to kill people ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] USSMojave@startrek.website 20 points 2 years ago So much nuance, wow permalink fedilink source parent [–] Vent@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Yes. A very large part of what made the holocaust so terrible was that it was very effective at killing people. permalink fedilink source parent [–] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) If my goal was to kill exclusively enemy combatants and leave all civilians alone, it would be pretty effective to round them up and gas them, yes. I'd rather do that than indiscriminate fire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Combatants tend to violently fight back, when you try to round them up. They also tend to hide among civilians in case of terrorist militia like Hezbollah. permalink fedilink source parent [–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 2 years ago ...are you implying that mass gas chambers aren't an effective way to kill people? permalink fedilink source parent [–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Do you admit that mass gas chambers are an effective way to kill people ? so is climate change???? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 20 points 2 years ago So much nuance, wow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vent@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Yes. A very large part of what made the holocaust so terrible was that it was very effective at killing people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) If my goal was to kill exclusively enemy combatants and leave all civilians alone, it would be pretty effective to round them up and gas them, yes. I'd rather do that than indiscriminate fire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Combatants tend to violently fight back, when you try to round them up. They also tend to hide among civilians in case of terrorist militia like Hezbollah. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Combatants tend to violently fight back, when you try to round them up. They also tend to hide among civilians in case of terrorist militia like Hezbollah. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 2 years ago ...are you implying that mass gas chambers aren't an effective way to kill people? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Do you admit that mass gas chambers are an effective way to kill people ? so is climate change???? permalink fedilink source parent
