▲ 496 ▼ Ask why the cops need this (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 212 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's pretty clear from your comments that you do support it. Why are you trying to hide that now? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all for massive gun control reform. I'm also all for minorities being allowed to arm themselves since they are being hunted down by white supremacists just for going to the store. I'm for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face. That's a very disingenuous way of casting the argument. It has nothing to do with minorities, only with gun owners and supporters of gun ownership in general, regardless of race. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No it's not disingenuous. Bi_tux is a minority. Agitator told him that he's the reason black kids get shot in the face. Bi_tux needs a gun in response to the hostility and violence of bigots. Ignoring bi_tux's minority status and original statement because it's inconvenient is kinda disingenuous though. Bi_tux (or any other minorities) having guns or not isn't the cause of bigots shooting black kids in the face for ringing a doorbell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, actually, it is. You either support gun rights and gun ownership or you don't. If you do, you contribute to kids getting shot in the face. Minority status is irrelevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm all for massive gun control reform. I'm also all for minorities being allowed to arm themselves since they are being hunted down by white supremacists just for going to the store. I'm for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face. That's a very disingenuous way of casting the argument. It has nothing to do with minorities, only with gun owners and supporters of gun ownership in general, regardless of race. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No it's not disingenuous. Bi_tux is a minority. Agitator told him that he's the reason black kids get shot in the face. Bi_tux needs a gun in response to the hostility and violence of bigots. Ignoring bi_tux's minority status and original statement because it's inconvenient is kinda disingenuous though. Bi_tux (or any other minorities) having guns or not isn't the cause of bigots shooting black kids in the face for ringing a doorbell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, actually, it is. You either support gun rights and gun ownership or you don't. If you do, you contribute to kids getting shot in the face. Minority status is irrelevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face. That's a very disingenuous way of casting the argument. It has nothing to do with minorities, only with gun owners and supporters of gun ownership in general, regardless of race. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No it's not disingenuous. Bi_tux is a minority. Agitator told him that he's the reason black kids get shot in the face. Bi_tux needs a gun in response to the hostility and violence of bigots. Ignoring bi_tux's minority status and original statement because it's inconvenient is kinda disingenuous though. Bi_tux (or any other minorities) having guns or not isn't the cause of bigots shooting black kids in the face for ringing a doorbell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, actually, it is. You either support gun rights and gun ownership or you don't. If you do, you contribute to kids getting shot in the face. Minority status is irrelevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No it's not disingenuous. Bi_tux is a minority. Agitator told him that he's the reason black kids get shot in the face. Bi_tux needs a gun in response to the hostility and violence of bigots. Ignoring bi_tux's minority status and original statement because it's inconvenient is kinda disingenuous though. Bi_tux (or any other minorities) having guns or not isn't the cause of bigots shooting black kids in the face for ringing a doorbell. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, actually, it is. You either support gun rights and gun ownership or you don't. If you do, you contribute to kids getting shot in the face. Minority status is irrelevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, actually, it is. You either support gun rights and gun ownership or you don't. If you do, you contribute to kids getting shot in the face. Minority status is irrelevant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WindInTrees@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I'm done with this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Semantics? It's in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn't hold up and I'm getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that. permalink fedilink source parent
