▲ 449 ▼ Indiana police have dogs that sniff specifically for cash at the US’s 2nd biggest FedEx hub, then they simply keep the money (eu.indystar.com) submitted 2 years ago by activistPnk@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@sopuli.xyz 102 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/13145612 (edit) Would someone please ship some counterfeit money through there and get it confiscated, so the police can then be investigated for spending counterfeit money?
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You might get a couple but there's thousands of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) More people like me need balls. Especially me. More importantly, I need to be armed and can't just go buy at a store because of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) By the time you have enough buy in to seriously threaten the cops in an area, you also have enough buy in to just elect politicians that will disarm them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think you understand just how outnumbered they are and how disadvantaged they are standing out so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No I know that. But you have to get X amount of people to be willing to do something. It so happens that amount is almost always enough to also enforce reforms and oversight on the police. Making violence unnecessary and counter productive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Tbh, I think it takes far fewer to kill them all. That said, we gotta have some kind of public safety system to replace them anyhow, so we may as well just whip them into shape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) More people like me need balls. Especially me. More importantly, I need to be armed and can't just go buy at a store because of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) By the time you have enough buy in to seriously threaten the cops in an area, you also have enough buy in to just elect politicians that will disarm them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think you understand just how outnumbered they are and how disadvantaged they are standing out so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No I know that. But you have to get X amount of people to be willing to do something. It so happens that amount is almost always enough to also enforce reforms and oversight on the police. Making violence unnecessary and counter productive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Tbh, I think it takes far fewer to kill them all. That said, we gotta have some kind of public safety system to replace them anyhow, so we may as well just whip them into shape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) By the time you have enough buy in to seriously threaten the cops in an area, you also have enough buy in to just elect politicians that will disarm them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think you understand just how outnumbered they are and how disadvantaged they are standing out so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No I know that. But you have to get X amount of people to be willing to do something. It so happens that amount is almost always enough to also enforce reforms and oversight on the police. Making violence unnecessary and counter productive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Tbh, I think it takes far fewer to kill them all. That said, we gotta have some kind of public safety system to replace them anyhow, so we may as well just whip them into shape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think you understand just how outnumbered they are and how disadvantaged they are standing out so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No I know that. But you have to get X amount of people to be willing to do something. It so happens that amount is almost always enough to also enforce reforms and oversight on the police. Making violence unnecessary and counter productive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Tbh, I think it takes far fewer to kill them all. That said, we gotta have some kind of public safety system to replace them anyhow, so we may as well just whip them into shape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No I know that. But you have to get X amount of people to be willing to do something. It so happens that amount is almost always enough to also enforce reforms and oversight on the police. Making violence unnecessary and counter productive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Tbh, I think it takes far fewer to kill them all. That said, we gotta have some kind of public safety system to replace them anyhow, so we may as well just whip them into shape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Tbh, I think it takes far fewer to kill them all. That said, we gotta have some kind of public safety system to replace them anyhow, so we may as well just whip them into shape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Nah, if you don't have that level of buy in then all you've done is start a war and divided everyone. You're forgetting that they get to recruit new people too. You need enough buy in that they couldn't replace their losses. Which is generally going to be a super majority. permalink fedilink source parent