you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

worse transcoding performance

You have to pay on Plex to use hardware acceleration for transcoding. Lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It doesn't make the point any less valid. I would pay for better transcoding performance in jf if it were an option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I have hard time believing Plex's software transcoding is more performant than Jellyfin's hardware accelerated trandcoding

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    My problems are less about speed and more about compatibility. I have Plex and jelly thing set up next to each other as containers on the same media database. There's quite a number of videos that play on Plex that will not play on jellyfin. It could be problems between the two clients.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've understood that "performance" in this sort of context mean how quickly a given task is done

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They're mostly just using FFmpeg behind the scenes, which is exactly how Plex did it to start with. Plex spent a long time working on hardware acceleration, it's hard to tell exactly what they're doing at this point but it's safe to say they spend a hell of a lot of time on it so I doubt they're just using FFmpeg for hardware acceleration anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments