-19
Celebrities will never adopt the Fediverse until usernames are centralized. (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
149 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Because let's say you're Tom Hanks. And you get TomHanks@Lemmy.World

Well, what's stopping someone else from adopting TomHanks@Lemm.ee?

And some platforms minimize the text size of platform, or hide it entirely. So you just might see TomHanks, and think it's him. But it's actually a 7 year old Chinese boy with a broken leg in Arizona.

Because anyone can grab the same name, on a different platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I'm not here for celebrities and they will always flock to centralized platforms anyways, since they are all about the views.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    they will always flock to centralized platforms anyways,

    I'm trying to change that.

    since they are all about the views.

    Which is why if we make the fediverse normalized for celebrities to host content, they can get more views here.

    I fully believe that this fediverse concept CAN be the future of the entire internet. Services that don't even exist yet can integrate with the fediverse, and it can scale easily by it's very nature. But there's a LOT of rough edges that keep the normies away....for now.

    Right now, the fediverse is more than just decentralized. It's fractured.

    Imagine posting an update on something, and it goes out to your mastodon, your Lemmy community, your pixelfed, and your peertube accounts. All at once. You wouldn't follow services, you'd follow people.

    But we'd need all these services to integrate with each other nicely. And part of that would be making it so you don't have 7 different accounts for 7 different services. You have 1 account, and sign up for each service under that account.

    All your notifications would go to the same place.

    Your identity would be your username. People would know if it's your username, it's you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But people here don't really care that much about celebrities being here and maybe not even their username being unique. Could probably be anon1, anon2, etc and it wouldn't matter that much, since real identity is probably not a draw for them. Focus on regular people wanting the userbase to want to use fediverse rather than celebrities which is an off-putting first impression and point of sale for lot of people here.

    You need to pivot is what I'm saying to achieve what you want.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    But you need to get the celebrities here first FOR the regular userbase to follow. Which is the whole point of the post.

    It's like those dog memes about the stick. "No take! Only throw!" Well, you have to take the stick first, THEN you can throw the stick.

    Well, you need the celebrities here first, THEN the regular userbase will come.

    So how do you get them here? Well first you make a list of every problem that would prevent a celebrity from coming here. Then iron out those rough edges first.

    I've already talked in other posts prior how the only way to grow the userbase is to be welcoming of people that you have no interest in interacting with. But it's fine. Because they don't want to interact with you either. It doesn't matter though because you can be on /c/Linuxmemes, and they can be on /c/homeandgarden.

    And if Martha Stewart posted on /c/homeandgarden she'd bring her fanbase with her. And if Ozzy Osborn posted on /c/ozzybitesabat he'd bring his fanbase.

    And so on and so on with each new celebrity. Some of them have overlap, some don't. But you're bringing more people, who create more instances, and then niche communities can develop. You get more people posting more content. And the platform grows with more varied topics than just politics, technology and video games.

    Or you could ignore what the celebrities want, and google, and reddit, and instagram will always be the dominant platforms, while nobody will have ever heard of the fediverse.

    I'm trying to bring the current system down.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    "Celebrities" is quite a broad term.

    I guess most people here were thinking about people they don't really share values with (let's say reality tv influencers for instance). On the other hand, if someone like Keanu Reeves for instance would do an AMA here, I'm pretty sure everyone would be happy and thankful for them to put some light on the Fediverse

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent