you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 88 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Don't assume malice when ignorance is an apt explanation.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    He's a ridiculously successful pop star! His PR team has a PR team! There's at least a handful of people whose sole full time job is to make sure that he doesn't make any mistakes out of ignorance that might make him look bad.

    This was on purpose and with all pertinent information available.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 25 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Hanlon's Razor has been weaponized too many times

    And the rich, affluent, and powerful are thankful for it.

    An act of malice is a crime.
    An act of stupidity is specifically not.

    Whom does Hanlon's Razor benefit?
    An accosted's peace of mind, or an accoster's ass?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    In this case, is there a functional difference? Will this pop star suddenly realize that the workers were protesting and join them in solidarity? Or will he go back to his life and continue to ignore the problem?

    At a certain point, ignorance and malice qchievw the same effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So when you buy a phone made from slave labor, are ignorant of the fact until someone tells you about it, but buy another phone built from slave labor, are you malicious?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments