submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I wonder why that isn't /cfg? Is there a historical reason?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    According to this, it's been around since the 70's and was originally just a catch-all for files that didn't fit in the other default directories, but over time has come to be mostly used for config files. I assume it would cause utter mayhem to try and change the name now so I guess it just sticks. Someone suggested "Edit To Configure" as a backronym to try and make it make more sense if that helps anyone lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is there a historical reason?

    If you're asking that in anything Linux related, it's probably a Yes 99% of the time LMAO

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Not just Linux... 99% of the time you see something weird in the computing world, the reason is going to be "because history."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments