▲ 491 ▼ Maybe this is better for everyone (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 444 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Lmao not if you're hunting with spears! Or are we allowed to use tools in this hypothetical digression? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) you're the one obsessed with defending a paper whose scope was too limited to cover any of these scenarios so do what you want i guess permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're the one obsessed with dismissing the paper based on qualifiers beyond the scope of the research, so you do you I guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) i'm not dismissing the paper. i'm explaining how it's being deceptively framed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think there was anything deceptive about its framing, it was addressing the claim that 'vegan diets are a luxury' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) you're the one obsessed with defending a paper whose scope was too limited to cover any of these scenarios so do what you want i guess permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're the one obsessed with dismissing the paper based on qualifiers beyond the scope of the research, so you do you I guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) i'm not dismissing the paper. i'm explaining how it's being deceptively framed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think there was anything deceptive about its framing, it was addressing the claim that 'vegan diets are a luxury' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're the one obsessed with dismissing the paper based on qualifiers beyond the scope of the research, so you do you I guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) i'm not dismissing the paper. i'm explaining how it's being deceptively framed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think there was anything deceptive about its framing, it was addressing the claim that 'vegan diets are a luxury' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) i'm not dismissing the paper. i'm explaining how it's being deceptively framed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think there was anything deceptive about its framing, it was addressing the claim that 'vegan diets are a luxury' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think there was anything deceptive about its framing, it was addressing the claim that 'vegan diets are a luxury' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago i don’t really know YES, now you're getting it permalink fedilink source parent
