▲ 491 ▼ Maybe this is better for everyone (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 444 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wouldn’t it be cheaper to the state to subsidize a plant-based diet instead? regardless of what would be a good decision for the state, the oxford paper doesn't acknowledge the material conditions of most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) oxford paper doesn’t acknowledge the material conditions of most people It acknowledges the material conditions of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i don't see what your point could possibly be. most people will not find it cheaper to be vegan without significant changes to both their own lifestyle and systemic change. the oxford paper completely ignores anyone who isn't paying full price at the supermarket. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) The paper is discussing the cost of the diet, not the safety net programs that are built around the american diet. A paper that analyses the consumer choices and systemic hurtles to eating a vegan diet it would be a different paper, and it would be making a different point than this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) so the headline that is used on the site, and the excerpt used to create the link in this thread both need some heavy caveats. without proper context, both the claims made by them are actually false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) oxford paper doesn’t acknowledge the material conditions of most people It acknowledges the material conditions of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i don't see what your point could possibly be. most people will not find it cheaper to be vegan without significant changes to both their own lifestyle and systemic change. the oxford paper completely ignores anyone who isn't paying full price at the supermarket. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) The paper is discussing the cost of the diet, not the safety net programs that are built around the american diet. A paper that analyses the consumer choices and systemic hurtles to eating a vegan diet it would be a different paper, and it would be making a different point than this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) so the headline that is used on the site, and the excerpt used to create the link in this thread both need some heavy caveats. without proper context, both the claims made by them are actually false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i don't see what your point could possibly be. most people will not find it cheaper to be vegan without significant changes to both their own lifestyle and systemic change. the oxford paper completely ignores anyone who isn't paying full price at the supermarket. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) The paper is discussing the cost of the diet, not the safety net programs that are built around the american diet. A paper that analyses the consumer choices and systemic hurtles to eating a vegan diet it would be a different paper, and it would be making a different point than this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) so the headline that is used on the site, and the excerpt used to create the link in this thread both need some heavy caveats. without proper context, both the claims made by them are actually false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) The paper is discussing the cost of the diet, not the safety net programs that are built around the american diet. A paper that analyses the consumer choices and systemic hurtles to eating a vegan diet it would be a different paper, and it would be making a different point than this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) so the headline that is used on the site, and the excerpt used to create the link in this thread both need some heavy caveats. without proper context, both the claims made by them are actually false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) so the headline that is used on the site, and the excerpt used to create the link in this thread both need some heavy caveats. without proper context, both the claims made by them are actually false. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe to you.... To me it seems like you're trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) we haven't said anything about my diet. i'm talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i'd prefer if you didn't make tihs personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not trying to make this about you, i'm just trying to respond to what I think you're trying to argue that you didn't explicitly say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You're just being ridiculous now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) that's what i'm asking you to stop doing. stop making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago We can't have a discussion at all if we're not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other. stop making it personal. I'd kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I'm doing. You're making it personal. permalink fedilink source parent
