-9
Victoria Nuland: Ukraine has “biological research facilities,” worried Russia may seize them | MR Online (mronline.org)
submitted 3 years ago* by [M] to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Finally admits it after screaming Russian propaganda hih?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Fake?! https://youtu.be/ydSf57SRtcQ

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    You cannot target Russian DNA. For starters, it's very similar to Ukrainian DNA...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It is functionally identical, given the close recent history between the two countries. For that matter, all humans are close, especially at a population level. People are trying to make this too complicated. Conventional weapons are perfectly capable of doing massive damage to an army without insane amounts of collateral damage, both to civilians and allies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Organizations like CIA have a long history of pursuing precisely these kinds of insane ideas.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The US doesnt care about sacrificing Ukrainians as long as they can hurt Russia.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    But Ukraine would, and the accusation is that this is being developed in Ukrainian labs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ukraine isn't a sovereign state, it's a puppet régime run by US.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ok, I should have been more specific: the way it is often framed (and the way I have seen it framed, and how the linked article frames it) is as if these were US-affiliated labs working on bioweapons. That is not what Nuland said. Biological research facilities do not have to be bioweapons labs, just as explosives research facilities need not be arms manufacturers.

    Greenwald (the author of the linked article) of course does what Greenwald recently is hell-bent on doing, which is to try to scandalize anything he can. I used to respect the man, but that was a long while ago.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •