People Twitter

10,298 readers

7,166 active

486 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago

moderators

Donald emails (sh.itjust.works)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

You're right, it does not mean the mission of WikiLeaks changed. It clearly hasn't. They still have never had to retract a single document or story.

parent

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

But weren’t some of the Clinton email leaks proven to be planted?

parent

[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

The Clinton emails were first released by the State Department under FOIA. (WikiLeaks were first to publish the different archives of the Podesta email leak and the DNC email leak.) Both WL and the Wall Street Journal each made the Clinton emails into a searchable database.
WikiLeaks has never had to retract a single document or story.

parent

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Ah, I was confusing the fact that the right wing internet trolls planted faked emails among the Wikileaks dump. Misremembered

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4