▲ 794 ▼ I've heard it clears up again after the first wave of divorces (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by merari42@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Larry@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (3 children) If you're still looking for good men at 35 you're also single for a reason permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago I mean there's plenty of reasons to be single at 35 that aren't necessarily a knock against you as a potential partner. Long term partner cheated on you, long term partner died, long term partner grew apart, active duty in the military for 18 years, maybe the person threw themselves into work and was too focused on work to date or maybe they were caring for a declining family member and too busy to date, or maybe they were going through shit and they're finally ready to date again after a lot of time healing and climbing out. You get the picture permalink fedilink source parent [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not necessarily. If she was an anxious attached style she'd be more likely to fall for avoidant men. She could either: Now recognize the red flags of avoidants and not subject herself to that. Be unaware of the red flags of avoidants and keep making the same mistake Recently left a long term relationship as an secure individual and discover how many avoidants really exist. Of course you are right, she could be avoidant to, in which case hopefully she'll learn sooner rather than later that fearing intimacy and vulnerability is detrimental, and that healthy codependency is actually a thing. But it's not easy for them to do so. I don't like to think that everyone is incapable of finding someone, people just need to figure out why. Pointing out "single for a reason" seems counterproductive and a bit disrespectful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cheeseandrice@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I think “single for a reason” is what all that attachment theory shit is trying to help contextualize. It specifically sets the context as “single for a fixable reason” if you have the courage and humility to do the work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Is living in the forest because I'm afraid of the federal government a "fixable" reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's just being awesome... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I suppose I didn't consider the act of an anxious attached falling for the avoidant attached as that "reason" I sort of chalked that up to luck. But your right, anxious attachment tends to end up with avoidant and the anxious attachment needs to learn how to desensitize to intense passion often given by avoidants. The anxious attached individual has a lot of work to do in regards to understanding their personal value rather than their value to others, where the avoidant has immense work to do on the value of others and the value of themselves. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not dating advice, it's attachment theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago I mean there's plenty of reasons to be single at 35 that aren't necessarily a knock against you as a potential partner. Long term partner cheated on you, long term partner died, long term partner grew apart, active duty in the military for 18 years, maybe the person threw themselves into work and was too focused on work to date or maybe they were caring for a declining family member and too busy to date, or maybe they were going through shit and they're finally ready to date again after a lot of time healing and climbing out. You get the picture permalink fedilink source parent
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not necessarily. If she was an anxious attached style she'd be more likely to fall for avoidant men. She could either: Now recognize the red flags of avoidants and not subject herself to that. Be unaware of the red flags of avoidants and keep making the same mistake Recently left a long term relationship as an secure individual and discover how many avoidants really exist. Of course you are right, she could be avoidant to, in which case hopefully she'll learn sooner rather than later that fearing intimacy and vulnerability is detrimental, and that healthy codependency is actually a thing. But it's not easy for them to do so. I don't like to think that everyone is incapable of finding someone, people just need to figure out why. Pointing out "single for a reason" seems counterproductive and a bit disrespectful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cheeseandrice@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I think “single for a reason” is what all that attachment theory shit is trying to help contextualize. It specifically sets the context as “single for a fixable reason” if you have the courage and humility to do the work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Is living in the forest because I'm afraid of the federal government a "fixable" reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's just being awesome... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I suppose I didn't consider the act of an anxious attached falling for the avoidant attached as that "reason" I sort of chalked that up to luck. But your right, anxious attachment tends to end up with avoidant and the anxious attachment needs to learn how to desensitize to intense passion often given by avoidants. The anxious attached individual has a lot of work to do in regards to understanding their personal value rather than their value to others, where the avoidant has immense work to do on the value of others and the value of themselves. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not dating advice, it's attachment theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cheeseandrice@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I think “single for a reason” is what all that attachment theory shit is trying to help contextualize. It specifically sets the context as “single for a fixable reason” if you have the courage and humility to do the work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Is living in the forest because I'm afraid of the federal government a "fixable" reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's just being awesome... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I suppose I didn't consider the act of an anxious attached falling for the avoidant attached as that "reason" I sort of chalked that up to luck. But your right, anxious attachment tends to end up with avoidant and the anxious attachment needs to learn how to desensitize to intense passion often given by avoidants. The anxious attached individual has a lot of work to do in regards to understanding their personal value rather than their value to others, where the avoidant has immense work to do on the value of others and the value of themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Is living in the forest because I'm afraid of the federal government a "fixable" reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's just being awesome... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago :( permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's just being awesome... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago :( permalink fedilink source parent
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I suppose I didn't consider the act of an anxious attached falling for the avoidant attached as that "reason" I sort of chalked that up to luck. But your right, anxious attachment tends to end up with avoidant and the anxious attachment needs to learn how to desensitize to intense passion often given by avoidants. The anxious attached individual has a lot of work to do in regards to understanding their personal value rather than their value to others, where the avoidant has immense work to do on the value of others and the value of themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not dating advice, it's attachment theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not dating advice, it's attachment theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs. Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent