▲ 179 ▼ BBC News - Luis Rubiales: Spanish FA will take legal action over Jennifer Hermoso 'lies' (www.bbc.co.uk) submitted 2 years ago by BobTheBoozer@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] osarusan@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) One party says it was spontaneous consent and the other party said it was not, so how do we as the internet observer what it truly was? You are a clown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You are a child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent [+] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com -26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Thanks, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) No man. Use your fucking brain. This is either one of the most intellectually dishonest arguments I have ever seen or you are truly an idiot. You're saying the equivalent of "How do we know person A punched person B, and it wasn't person B who slammed his face into person A's fist? shrug We as internet observers just can't know." It's disgustingly dishonest. Everyone is trying to tell you this and you keep retreating further. Step out of your shoes or whatever personal reason is causing you to have this cognitive dissonance and look the situation honestly. You should see that your posts defending this have been pathetic and dishonest. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can't focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him. You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobman@unilem.org -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You are a child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com -26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Thanks, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) No man. Use your fucking brain. This is either one of the most intellectually dishonest arguments I have ever seen or you are truly an idiot. You're saying the equivalent of "How do we know person A punched person B, and it wasn't person B who slammed his face into person A's fist? shrug We as internet observers just can't know." It's disgustingly dishonest. Everyone is trying to tell you this and you keep retreating further. Step out of your shoes or whatever personal reason is causing you to have this cognitive dissonance and look the situation honestly. You should see that your posts defending this have been pathetic and dishonest. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can't focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him. You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] osarusan@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) No man. Use your fucking brain. This is either one of the most intellectually dishonest arguments I have ever seen or you are truly an idiot. You're saying the equivalent of "How do we know person A punched person B, and it wasn't person B who slammed his face into person A's fist? shrug We as internet observers just can't know." It's disgustingly dishonest. Everyone is trying to tell you this and you keep retreating further. Step out of your shoes or whatever personal reason is causing you to have this cognitive dissonance and look the situation honestly. You should see that your posts defending this have been pathetic and dishonest. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can't focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him. You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobman@unilem.org -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can't focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him. You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him. You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling. permalink fedilink source parent