"access to totally different electronic information services" "has better info than any private individual."

I think I misunderstood you regarding the different information (did not notice the word "services").

In any case, any random person has access to that information. A doctor will be more likely to read such papers and will also be more qualified to interpret them compared to the average of the population. However, anecdotal evidence is still irrelevant. And so are titles. All that matters are the arguments. If some little kid has arguments against something a Nobel prize winning Professor says... then so be it.