▲ 32 ▼ FAMF: Files As Metadata Format (prma.dev) submitted 2 years ago by prma@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev 44 comments fedilink hide all child comments YAML and TOML suck. Long live the FAMF!
[–] prma@programming.dev [S] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Read the content. I address that issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ferk@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) For the record, you mention "the limitations of the number of inodes in Unix-like systems", but this is not a limit in Unix, but a limit in filesystem formats (which also extends to Windows and other systems). So it depends more on what the filesystem is rather than the OS. A FAT32 partition can only hold 65,535 files (2^16), but both ext4 and NTFS can have up to 4,294,967,295 (2^32). If using Btrfs then it jumps to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 (2^64). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prma@programming.dev [S] 1 point 2 years ago You are right. Fat32 is not recommended for implementing FAMF. permalink fedilink source parent [–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 point 2 years ago I know, I read it because I wanted to know too know if it was addressed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ferk@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) For the record, you mention "the limitations of the number of inodes in Unix-like systems", but this is not a limit in Unix, but a limit in filesystem formats (which also extends to Windows and other systems). So it depends more on what the filesystem is rather than the OS. A FAT32 partition can only hold 65,535 files (2^16), but both ext4 and NTFS can have up to 4,294,967,295 (2^32). If using Btrfs then it jumps to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 (2^64). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prma@programming.dev [S] 1 point 2 years ago You are right. Fat32 is not recommended for implementing FAMF. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prma@programming.dev [S] 1 point 2 years ago You are right. Fat32 is not recommended for implementing FAMF. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 point 2 years ago I know, I read it because I wanted to know too know if it was addressed permalink fedilink source parent