zarkanian comments on Joever rule

Other rules

Behavior rules:

No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)

No genocide denial

No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)

No namecalling

Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards

Other things seen as cleary bad

Posting rules:

No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)

No advertisements

No gore / violence

Mutual aid posts are not allowed

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

If they pick Kamala, who (after mistaking her for Trump) Biden claimed was not fit to be president

That's funny. I remember him saying the opposite.

Trump will just beat her into the ground like he did with Hillary.

Hillary didn't lose because of Trump. She lost because she's Hillary. Since Kamala isn't Hillary, she won't have that problem.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children)

That's funny. I remember him saying the opposite.

Am I mistaken? Just here in response to the question of whether Kamala would make a good president, he says "Look, I wouldn't have picked vice president Trump [Kamala] to be vice president. I think she's not qualified to be president. Let's start there."

Hillary didn't lose because of Trump. She lost because she's Hillary.

You may have a point there, I'll grant you, but I'm still not sure Kamala can come out on top. I'd very much like to be proven wrong, but we might have to wait for the next debate to gauge what direction we're heading in.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 12 points 2 years ago

His stumbling over the sentence cadence made him accidentally say the opposite. He meant to say that he wouldn't have picked her for VP if she wasn't qualified for president - think about it, that that's a far more normal thing for him to have said and I'm positive what he meant. He just tripped over the words.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I'd like the USA to not elect the fascists, but that's asking america to vote a black woman as president and we know that shit is not happening, sadly.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4